IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v6y1986i4p463-476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intersystem Common Cause Analysis of a Diesel Generator Failure

Author

Listed:
  • Joan K. Plastiras

Abstract

The methodology and results reported in this paper are based on an analysis of a hypothetical accident occurring in a two unit power plant with shared systems (i.e., the diesel generator, the emergency service water, and the residual heat removal service water systems). The accident postulated is a loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in one out of two nuclear units in conjunction with a loss of offsite power (LOOP) and a failure of one out of four diesel generators to start. To analyze the intersystem effects, we needed to develop and apply a new methodology, intersystem common cause analysis (ICCA). The ICCA methodology revealed problems which were not identified by the traditional intrasystem failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) performed earlier by the design teams. The first potential problem arises if one unit experiences a LOCA and diesel generator failure while one loop of its residual heat removal system is in the suppression pool cooling mode (SPCM); in this event, it is likely that minimum emergency core cooling system (ECCS) requirements will not be met. The second potential problem arises if a diesel generator fails while both units are simultaneously subjected to a controlled forced shutdown (a LOCA need not be postulated for either unit); in this event, it is likely that one unit will be required to use a heat removal path identified as off‐normal in the final safety analysis report (FSAR) for the two unit plant. These and other potential concerns identified through application of the ICCA presented here were resolved early in the design phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan K. Plastiras, 1986. "Intersystem Common Cause Analysis of a Diesel Generator Failure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 463-476, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:6:y:1986:i:4:p:463-476
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00958.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00958.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00958.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanley Kaplan, 1982. "Matrix Theory Formalism for Event Tree Analysis: Application to Nuclear‐Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 9-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen D. Unwin, 1984. "Binary Event String Analysis: A Compact Numerical Representation of the Event Tree," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 83-87, June.
    2. Stan Kaplan & Harold F. Perla & Dennis C. Bley, 1983. "A Methodology for Seismic Risk Analysis of Nuclear Power Plants," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3), pages 169-180, September.
    3. Ronald L. Iman & Jon C. Helton & Jay D. Johnson, 1990. "A Methodology for Grouping Source Terms for Consequence Calculations in Probabilistic Risk Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 507-520, December.
    4. Selim Sancaktar, 1982. "An Illustration of Matrix Formulation for a Probabilistic Risk‐Assessment Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 137-147, September.
    5. Jon C. Helton, 1994. "Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 483-511, August.
    6. Ronald L. Iman, 1987. "A Matrix‐Based Approach to Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for Fault Trees," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 21-33, March.
    7. Ronald L. Iman & Jon C. Helton, 1991. "The Repeatability of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses for Complex Probabilistic Risk Assessments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 591-606, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:6:y:1986:i:4:p:463-476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.