IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v34y2014i9p1618-1638.html

A Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment for Campylobacter in Petting Zoos

Author

Listed:
  • Eric G. Evers
  • Petra A. Berk
  • Mijke L. Horneman
  • Frans M. van Leusden
  • Rob de Jonge

Abstract

The significance of petting zoos for transmission of Campylobacter to humans and the effect of interventions were estimated. A stochastic QMRA model simulating a child or adult visiting a Dutch petting zoo was built. The model describes the transmission of Campylobacter in animal feces from the various animal species, fences, and the playground to ingestion by visitors through touching these so‐called carriers and subsequently touching their lips. Extensive field and laboratory research was done to fulfill data needs. Fecal contamination on all carriers was measured by swabbing in 10 petting zoos, using Escherichia coli as an indicator. Carrier‐hand and hand‐lip touching frequencies were estimated by, in total, 13 days of observations of visitors by two observers at two petting zoos. The transmission from carrier to hand and from hand to lip by touching was measured using preapplied cow feces to which E. coli WG5 was added as an indicator. Via a Beta‐Poisson dose‐response function, the number of Campylobacter cases for the whole of the Netherlands (16 million population) in a year was estimated at 187 and 52 for children and adults, respectively, so 239 in total. This is significantly lower than previous QMRA results on chicken fillet and drinking water consumption. Scenarios of 90% reduction of the contamination (meant to mimic cleaning) of all fences and just goat fences reduces the number of cases by 82% and 75%, respectively. The model can easily be adapted for other fecally transmitted pathogens.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric G. Evers & Petra A. Berk & Mijke L. Horneman & Frans M. van Leusden & Rob de Jonge, 2014. "A Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment for Campylobacter in Petting Zoos," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(9), pages 1618-1638, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:9:p:1618-1638
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12197
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maarten J. Nauta & Wilma F. Jacobs‐Reitsma & Arie H. Havelaar, 2007. "A Risk Assessment Model for Campylobacter in Broiler Meat," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 845-861, August.
    2. Halûk Özkaynak & Jianping Xue & Valerie G. Zartarian & Graham Glen & Luther Smith, 2011. "Modeled Estimates of Soil and Dust Ingestion Rates for Children," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 592-608, April.
    3. Arie H. Havelaar & Marie‐Josee J. Mangen & Aline A. De Koeijer & Marc‐Jeroen Bogaardt & Eric G. Evers & Wilma F. Jacobs‐Reitsma & Wilfrid Van Pelt & Jaap A. Wagenaar & G. Ardine De Wit & Henk Van Der , 2007. "Effectiveness and Efficiency of Controlling Campylobacter on Broiler Chicken Meat," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 831-844, August.
    4. P. F. M. Teunis & A. H. Havelaar, 2000. "The Beta Poisson Dose‐Response Model Is Not a Single‐Hit Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 513-520, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarina D.M. Pintar & Kate M. Thomas & Tanya Christidis & Ainsley Otten & Andrea Nesbitt & Barbara Marshall & Frank Pollari & Matt Hurst & Andre Ravel, 2017. "A Comparative Exposure Assessment of Campylobacter in Ontario, Canada," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 677-715, April.
    2. B. Chapman & K. Pintar & B. A. Smith, 2018. "Multi‐Exposure Pathway Model to Compare Escherichia coli O157 Risks and Interventions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 392-409, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric G. Evers & Hetty Blaak & Raditijo A. Hamidjaja & Rob de Jonge & Franciska M. Schets, 2016. "A QMRA for the Transmission of ESBL‐Producing Escherichia coli and Campylobacter from Poultry Farms to Humans Through Flies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 215-227, February.
    2. Sido D. Mylius & Maarten J. Nauta & Arie H. Havelaar, 2007. "Cross‐Contamination During Food Preparation: A Mechanistic Model Applied to Chicken‐Borne Campylobacter," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 803-813, August.
    3. Martijn Bouwknegt & Anne B. Knol & Jeroen P. van der Sluijs & Eric G. Evers, 2014. "Uncertainty of Population Risk Estimates for Pathogens Based on QMRA or Epidemiology: A Case Study of Campylobacter in the Netherlands," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 847-864, May.
    4. Marie‐Josée J. Mangen & Arie H. Havelaar & Krijn P. Poppe & G. Ardine De Wit & the CARMA Project Team, 2007. "Cost‐Utility Analysis to Control Campylobacter on Chicken Meat—Dealing with Data Limitations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 815-830, August.
    5. Dorota Kurowicka & Maarten Nauta & Katarzyna Jozwiak & Roger Cooke, 2010. "Updating Parameters of the Chicken Processing Line Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 934-944, June.
    6. Régis Pouillot & Benoit Garin & Noro Ravaonindrina & Kane Diop & Mahery Ratsitorahina & Domoina Ramanantsoa & Jocelyne Rocourt, 2012. "A Risk Assessment of Campylobacteriosis and Salmonellosis Linked to Chicken Meals Prepared in Households in Dakar, Senegal," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(10), pages 1798-1819, October.
    7. Wendelke E. A. Katsma & Aline A. De Koeijer & Wilma F. Jacobs‐Reitsma & Marie‐Josée J. Mangen & Jaap A. Wagenaar, 2007. "Assessing Interventions to Reduce the Risk of Campylobacter Prevalence in Broilers," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 863-876, August.
    8. Maarten Nauta & Bjarke Christensen, 2011. "The Impact of Consumer Phase Models in Microbial Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 255-265, February.
    9. Régis Pouillot & Véronique Goulet & Marie Laure Delignette‐Muller & Aurélie Mahé & Marie Cornu, 2009. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in French Cold‐Smoked Salmon: II. Risk Characterization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 806-819, June.
    10. Maarten J. Nauta & Arnout R. H. Fischer & Esther D. Van Asselt & Aarieke E. I. De Jong & Lynn J. Frewer & Rob De Jonge, 2008. "Food Safety in the Domestic Environment: The Effect of Consumer Risk Information on Human Disease Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 179-192, February.
    11. Wopke van der Werf & Lia Hemerik & Just M Vlak & Mark P Zwart, 2011. "Heterogeneous Host Susceptibility Enhances Prevalence of Mixed-Genotype Micro-Parasite Infections," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Amie Adkin & Neil Donaldson & Louise Kelly, 2013. "A Quantitative Assessment of the Prion Risk Associated with Wastewater from Carcass‐Handling Facilities," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(7), pages 1212-1227, July.
    13. Antti Mikkelä & Jukka Ranta & Manuel González & Marjaana Hakkinen & Pirkko Tuominen, 2016. "Campylobacter QMRA: A Bayesian Estimation of Prevalence and Concentration in Retail Foods Under Clustering and Heavy Censoring," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(11), pages 2065-2080, November.
    14. Ascioti, Fortunato A. & Mangano, Maria Cristina & Marcianò, Claudio & Sarà, Gianluca, 2022. "The sanitation service of seagrasses – Dependencies and implications for the estimation of avoided costs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    15. Mary J. Bartholomew & David J. Vose & Linda R. Tollefson & Curtis C. Travis, 2005. "A Linear Model for Managing the Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance Originating in Food Animals," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 99-108, February.
    16. Jack Schijven & Martijn Bouwknegt & Ana Maria de Roda Husman & Saskia Rutjes & Bertrand Sudre & Jonathan E. Suk & Jan C. Semenza, 2013. "A Decision Support Tool to Compare Waterborne and Foodborne Infection and/or Illness Risks Associated with Climate Change," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(12), pages 2154-2167, December.
    17. Philip J. Schmidt & Katarina D. M. Pintar & Aamir M. Fazil & Edward Topp, 2013. "Harnessing the Theoretical Foundations of the Exponential and Beta‐Poisson Dose‐Response Models to Quantify Parameter Uncertainty Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1677-1693, September.
    18. Jack Schijven & Gerard B. J. Rijs & Ana Maria De Roda Husman, 2005. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of FMD Virus Transmission via Water," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 13-21, February.
    19. Yukichika Kawata & Masahide Watanabe, 2018. "Economic feasibility of Campylobacter†reduced chicken: Do consumers have high willingness to pay?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 222-239, March.
    20. Lailai Chen & Helena Geys & Shaun Cawthraw & Arie Havelaar & Peter Teunis, 2006. "Dose Response for Infectivity of Several Strains of Campylobacter jejuni in Chickens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1613-1621, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:9:p:1618-1638. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.