IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v26y2006i5p1291-1309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vero‐Cytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in Pasteurized Milk Containers at the Point of Retail: A Qualitative Approach to Exposure Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Helen E. Clough
  • Daymian Clancy
  • Nigel P. French

Abstract

Dairies within the United Kingdom are classified into two groups, namely, off‐farm and on‐farm dairies (the latter often being small scale). We propose a model for the probability of milk sold as pasteurized reaching the point of retail contaminated with Vero‐cytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC) O157 from each of these two pathways. We evaluate qualitatively the exposures inherent in each, and compare and contrast the two situations. The model framework is generic, in that it can in principle be used, with the relevant data modifications, to provide a qualitative assessment of the likely exposure from milk sold as pasteurized to any potentially milk‐borne pathogenic organism. Furthermore, the methodological approaches presented are widely applicable in the microbial risk assessment field. The specific example presented will be of particular interest to the UK dairy and public health communities: we conclude that the exposure potential per liter consumed from milk processed in off‐farm dairies is negligible, whereas the exposure potential per liter consumed from milk processed on‐farm is low, but not sufficiently small to be regarded as negligible. We also identify areas of data sparsity, which need to be addressed for quantitative risk assessment to proceed, and highlight the critical points in the pasteurized milk production chain, which, in the event of a breakdown, have the potential to increase the risk to the consumer.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen E. Clough & Daymian Clancy & Nigel P. French, 2006. "Vero‐Cytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157 in Pasteurized Milk Containers at the Point of Retail: A Qualitative Approach to Exposure Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1291-1309, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:26:y:2006:i:5:p:1291-1309
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00825.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00825.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00825.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Teunis & Katsuhisa Takumi & Kunihiro Shinagawa, 2004. "Dose Response for Infection by Escherichia coli O157:H7 from Outbreak Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 401-407, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jane Heller & Louise Kelly & Stuart W. J. Reid & Dominic J. Mellor, 2010. "Qualitative Risk Assessment of the Acquisition of Meticillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Pet Dogs," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 458-472, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Ekman & Adam Goldwater & Mark Bradbury & Jim Matthews & Gordon Rogers, 2020. "Persistence of Human Pathogens in Manure-Amended Australian Soils Used for Production of Leafy Vegetables," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Peyton M. Ferrier & Jean C. Buzby, 2013. "The Economic Efficiency of Sampling Size: The Case of Beef Trim," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 368-384, March.
    3. Miao Guo & Abhinav Mishra & Robert L. Buchanan & Jitender P. Dubey & Dolores E. Hill & H. Ray Gamble & Jeffrey L. Jones & Xianzhi Du & Abani K. Pradhan, 2016. "Development of Dose‐Response Models to Predict the Relationship for Human Toxoplasma gondii Infection Associated with Meat Consumption," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 926-938, May.
    4. Lailai Chen & Helena Geys & Shaun Cawthraw & Arie Havelaar & Peter Teunis, 2006. "Dose Response for Infectivity of Several Strains of Campylobacter jejuni in Chickens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1613-1621, December.
    5. Gang Xie & Anne Roiko & Helen Stratton & Charles Lemckert & Peter K. Dunn & Kerrie Mengersen, 2017. "Guidelines for Use of the Approximate Beta‐Poisson Dose–Response Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(7), pages 1388-1402, July.
    6. B. Chapman & K. Pintar & B. A. Smith, 2018. "Multi‐Exposure Pathway Model to Compare Escherichia coli O157 Risks and Interventions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 392-409, February.
    7. Christopher Leleu & Jean Menotti & Pascale Meneceur & Firas Choukri & Annie Sulahian & Yves Jean‐François Garin & Jean‐Baptiste Denis & Francis Derouin, 2013. "Bayesian Development of a Dose‐Response Model for Aspergillus fumigatus and Invasive Aspergillosis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(8), pages 1441-1453, August.
    8. Gang Xie & Anne Roiko & Helen Stratton & Charles Lemckert & Peter K. Dunn & Kerrie Mengersen, 2016. "A Generalized QMRA Beta‐Poisson Dose‐Response Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1948-1958, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:26:y:2006:i:5:p:1291-1309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.