IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v63y2016i8p593-599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalizing the survival signature to unrepairable homogeneous multi‐state systems

Author

Listed:
  • Serkan Eryilmaz
  • Altan Tuncel

Abstract

The notion of signature has been widely applied for the reliability evaluation of technical systems that consist of binary components. Multi‐state system modeling is also widely used for representing real life engineering systems whose components can have different performance levels. In this article, the concept of survival signature is generalized to a certain class of unrepairable homogeneous multi‐state systems with multi‐state components. With such a generalization, a representation for the survival function of the time spent by a system in a specific state or above is obtained. The findings of the article are illustrated for multi‐state consecutive‐k‐out‐of‐n system which perform its task at three different performance levels. The generalization of the concept of survival signature to a multi‐state system with multiple types of components is also presented. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 63: 593–599, 2017

Suggested Citation

  • Serkan Eryilmaz & Altan Tuncel, 2016. "Generalizing the survival signature to unrepairable homogeneous multi‐state systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(8), pages 593-599, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:63:y:2016:i:8:p:593-599
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21722
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levitin, G. & Gertsbakh, I. & Shpungin, Y., 2011. "Evaluating the damage associated with intentional network disintegration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 433-439.
    2. Francisco J. Samaniego, 2007. "System Signatures and their Applications in Engineering Reliability," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-71797-5, April.
    3. Eryilmaz, Serkan, 2011. "Estimation in coherent reliability systems through copulas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 564-568.
    4. Louis J. M. Aslett & Frank P. A. Coolen & Simon P. Wilson, 2015. "Bayesian Inference for Reliability of Systems and Networks Using the Survival Signature," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(9), pages 1640-1651, September.
    5. Jorge Navarro & Francisco J. Samaniego & N. Balakrishnan & Debasis Bhattacharya, 2008. "On the application and extension of system signatures in engineering reliability," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(4), pages 313-327, June.
    6. Tavangar, Mahdi & Bairamov, Ismihan, 2015. "On conditional residual lifetime and conditional inactivity time of k-out-of-n systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 225-233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Behrensdorf, Jasper & Regenhardt, Tobias-Emanuel & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Numerically efficient computation of the survival signature for the reliability analysis of large networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Huang, Xianzhen & Aslett, Louis J.M. & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2019. "Reliability analysis of general phased mission systems with a new survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 416-422.
    3. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Yi, He & Cui, Lirong & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy, 2021. "Computation of survival signatures for multi-state consecutive-k systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Qin, Jinlei & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2022. "Survival signature for reliability evaluation of a multi-state system with multi-state components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    6. He Yi & Lirong Cui, 2018. "A new computation method for signature: Markov process method," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(5), pages 410-426, August.
    7. Jia, Xujie & Shen, Jingyuan & Xu, Fanqi & Ma, Ruihong & Song, Xueying, 2019. "Modular decomposition signature for systems with sequential failure effect," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 435-444.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Jinlei & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2022. "Survival signature for reliability evaluation of a multi-state system with multi-state components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    2. Tavangar, Mahdi & Hashemi, Marzieh, 2022. "Reliability and maintenance analysis of coherent systems subject to aging and environmental shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    3. M. Kelkinnama & M. Asadi, 2019. "Stochastic and ageing properties of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 805-821, June.
    4. Yi, He & Cui, Lirong & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy, 2021. "Computation of survival signatures for multi-state consecutive-k systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Hindolo George-Williams & Geng Feng & Frank PA Coolen & Michael Beer & Edoardo Patelli, 2019. "Extending the survival signature paradigm to complex systems with non-repairable dependent failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 505-519, August.
    6. Zhu, Xiaojun & Balakrishnan, N., 2023. "Non-parametric inference based on reliability life-test of non-identical coherent systems with application to warranty time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    7. Sadiya & Mangey Ram & Akshay Kumar, 2022. "A New Approach to Compute System Reliability with Three-Serially Linked Modules," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Burkschat, M. & Samaniego, F.J., 2018. "Dynamic IFR concepts for coherent systems," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-7.
    9. M. Kelkin Nama & M. Asadi, 2014. "Stochastic Properties of Components in a Used Coherent System," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 675-691, September.
    10. Markos V. Koutras & Ioannis S. Triantafyllou & Serkan Eryilmaz, 2016. "Stochastic Comparisons Between Lifetimes of Reliability Systems with Exchangeable Components," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1081-1095, December.
    11. A. Toomaj & M. Doostparast, 2016. "On the Kullback Leibler information for mixed systems," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(10), pages 2458-2465, July.
    12. Jorge Navarro & Rafael Rubio, 2011. "A note on necessary and sufficient conditions for ordering properties of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(5), pages 478-489, August.
    13. He Yi & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Xiang Li, 2023. "Multi-State Joint Survival Signature for Multi-State Systems with Shared Multi-State Components," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Huang, Xianzhen & Aslett, Louis J.M. & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2019. "Reliability analysis of general phased mission systems with a new survival signature," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 416-422.
    15. M. Chahkandi & Jafar Ahmadi & S. Baratpour, 2014. "Non-parametric prediction intervals for the lifetime of coherent systems," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1019-1034, November.
    16. Salehi, Ebrahim & Tavangar, Mahdi, 2019. "Stochastic comparisons on conditional residual lifetime and inactivity time of coherent systems with exchangeable components," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 327-337.
    17. He Yi & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Lirong Cui, 2021. "Comparisons of Multi-State Systems with Binary Components of Different Sizes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1309-1321, December.
    18. Foschi Rachele & Nappo Giovanna & Spizzichino Fabio L., 2021. "Diagonal sections of copulas, multivariate conditional hazard rates and distributions of order statistics for minimally stable lifetimes," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 394-423, January.
    19. Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Hon Ng & Jorge Navarro, 2011. "Exact nonparametric inference for component lifetime distribution based on lifetime data from systems with known signatures," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 741-752.
    20. Serkan Eryilmaz, 2015. "Systems composed of two types of nonidentical and dependent components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(5), pages 388-394, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:63:y:2016:i:8:p:593-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.