IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v48y2001i4p293-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple common due dates

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Dickman
  • Yonah Wilamowsky
  • Sheldon Epstein

Abstract

Common due date problems have been extensively discussed in the scheduling literature. Initially, these problems discussed finding a common due date for a set of jobs on a single machine. These single machine problems were later extended to finding the common due date on a set of parallel machines. This paper further extends the single machine problem to finding multiple common due dates on a single machine. For a basic and important class of penalty functions, we show that this problem is comparable to the parallel machine problem. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 48: 293–298, 2001

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Dickman & Yonah Wilamowsky & Sheldon Epstein, 2001. "Multiple common due dates," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(4), pages 293-298, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:48:y:2001:i:4:p:293-298
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.9
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. S. Sundararaghavan & Mesbah U. Ahmed, 1984. "Minimizing the sum of absolute lateness in single‐machine and multimachine scheduling," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 325-333, June.
    2. S. S. Panwalkar & M. L. Smith & A. Seidmann, 1982. "Common Due Date Assignment to Minimize Total Penalty for the One Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 391-399, April.
    3. A. Federgruen & G. Mosheiov, 1996. "Heuristics for Multimachine Scheduling Problems with Earliness and Tardiness Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(11), pages 1544-1555, November.
    4. Kenneth R. Baker & Gary D. Scudder, 1990. "Sequencing with Earliness and Tardiness Penalties: A Review," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 22-36, February.
    5. Cheng, T. C. E. & Gupta, M. C., 1989. "Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 156-166, January.
    6. Nicholas G. Hall, 1986. "Single‐ and multiple‐processor models for minimizing completion time variance," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 49-54, February.
    7. Hamilton Emmons, 1987. "Scheduling to a common due date on parallel uniform processors," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 803-810, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Ji & Xin Zhang & Xiaoying Tang & T.C.E. Cheng & Guiyi Wei & Yuanyuan Tan, 2016. "Group scheduling with group-dependent multiple due windows assignment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1244-1256, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabuddha De & Jay B. Ghosh & Charles E. Wells, 1994. "Due‐date assignment and early/tardy scheduling on identical parallel machines," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 17-32, February.
    2. Enrique Gerstl & Gur Mosheiov, 2014. "Single machine just‐in‐time scheduling problems with two competing agents," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Adamopoulos, G. I. & Pappis, C. P., 1996. "Scheduling jobs with different, job-dependent earliness and tardiness penalties using the SLK method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 336-344, January.
    4. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Li, Shisheng & Ng, C.T. & Yuan, Jinjiang, 2011. "Group scheduling and due date assignment on a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 230-235, April.
    6. Kerem Bülbül & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Halil Şen, 2019. "Single-machine common due date total earliness/tardiness scheduling with machine unavailability," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 543-565, October.
    7. Mosheiov, Gur & Shadmon, Michal, 2001. "Minmax earliness-tardiness costs with unit processing time jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 638-652, May.
    8. Zhi-Long Chen, 1997. "Scheduling with batch setup times and earliness-tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 518-537, February.
    9. Chen, Zhi-Long, 1996. "Scheduling and common due date assignment with earliness-tardiness penalties and batch delivery costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 49-60, August.
    10. Lin, Shih-Wei & Chou, Shuo-Yan & Ying, Kuo-Ching, 2007. "A sequential exchange approach for minimizing earliness-tardiness penalties of single-machine scheduling with a common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1294-1301, March.
    11. T C E Cheng & L Y Kang & C T Ng, 2007. "Due-date assignment and parallel-machine scheduling with deteriorating jobs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(8), pages 1103-1108, August.
    12. T. C. E. Cheng & H. G. Kahlbacher, 1991. "A proof for the longest‐job‐first policy in one‐machine scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 715-720, October.
    13. X. Cai & S. Zhou, 1997. "Scheduling stochastic jobs with asymmetric earliness and tardiness penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(6), pages 531-557, September.
    14. Chen, Zhi-Long & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2002. "Parallel machine scheduling with a common due window," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 512-527, February.
    15. Kerem Bülbül & Philip Kaminsky & Candace Yano, 2004. "Flow shop scheduling with earliness, tardiness, and intermediate inventory holding costs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(3), pages 407-445, April.
    16. Joseph Y.‐T. Leung, 2002. "A dual criteria sequencing problem with earliness and tardiness penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 422-431, June.
    17. Adamopoulos, G. I. & Pappis, C. P., 1995. "The CON due-date determination method with processing time-dependent lateness penalties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 29-36, June.
    18. Soroush, H. M., 1999. "Sequencing and due-date determination in the stochastic single machine problem with earliness and tardiness costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 450-468, March.
    19. Chung‐Lun Li & T. C. E. Cheng, 1994. "The parallel machine min‐max weighted absolute lateness scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 33-46, February.
    20. Srirangacharyulu, B. & Srinivasan, G., 2013. "An exact algorithm to minimize mean squared deviation of job completion times about a common due date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 547-556.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:48:y:2001:i:4:p:293-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.