IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i5-6p664-675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Competence and Attitudes towards Vital Signs Monitoring during Clinical Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry
  • Jonas Preposi Cruz
  • Meshrif Ahmad Bashtawi
  • Khalid Obaid Almutairi
  • Regie B. Tumala

Abstract

Aim and Objective This study assessed the perceived knowledge and competence, and the attitude of Saudi nursing students towards vital signs monitoring for detecting patient deterioration during clinical rotation. It also examined the predictors of students’ attitudes. Background One of the most important uses of vital signs monitoring is the early detection of deterioration. Vital signs monitoring is one of the most frequently assigned tasks to students during clinical rotation. However, the attitudes of nursing students towards vital signs monitoring for detecting clinical deterioration remain unexplored. Design Quantitative, cross‐sectional design. Method A convenience sample of 529 baccalaureate nursing students in two universities in Saudi Arabia was surveyed using the V‐scale from October 2019–December 2019. A multivariate multiple regression was implemented to examine the multivariate effect of the predictor variables on the five subscales of the V‐scale. This study adhered to the STROBE checklist. Results The overall attitudes of the students towards VS monitoring can be interpreted as poor to modest. The highest mean was reported in the subscale ‘communication’. The subscales ‘workload’, ‘key indicators’ and ‘technology’ received low mean scores. The university, age, gender, academic year level and perceived knowledge had significant multivariate effects on the five subscales of the V‐scale. Conclusions The Saudi nursing students had poor attitudes towards vital signs monitoring, specifically towards the use of technology in vital signs monitoring, the workload associated with vital signs monitoring and vital signs as key indicators of patient deterioration. Relevance to Clinical Practice The findings reveal the need to improve the curricular content and training of nursing students regarding vital signs and the physiological indicators of clinical deterioration. This study also identified areas that require improvement to ensure positive attitudes among students.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Jonas Preposi Cruz & Meshrif Ahmad Bashtawi & Khalid Obaid Almutairi & Regie B. Tumala, 2021. "Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Competence and Attitudes towards Vital Signs Monitoring during Clinical Practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 664-675, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:664-675
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15586
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo M Padilla & Ann M Mayo, 2018. "Clinical deterioration: A concept analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1360-1368, April.
    2. Simon Cooper & Leigh Kinsman & Penny Buykx & Tracy McConnell‐Henry & Ruth Endacott & Julie Scholes, 2010. "Managing the deteriorating patient in a simulated environment: nursing students’ knowledge, skill and situation awareness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2309-2318, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia L. Hart & LeeAnna Spiva & Lonnie Dolly & Kristen Lang‐Coleman & Nadia Prince‐Williams, 2016. "Medical‐surgical nurses' experiences as first responders during deterioration events: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3241-3251, November.
    2. Marion Tower & Bernadette Watson & Alison Bourke & Emma Tyers & Anne Tin, 2019. "Situation awareness and the decision‐making processes of final‐year nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3923-3934, November.
    3. Ricardo M Padilla & Ann M Mayo, 2018. "Clinical deterioration: A concept analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1360-1368, April.
    4. Torunn Strømme & Karina Aase & Ingrid Tjoflåt, 2020. "Homecare professionals’ observation of deteriorating, frail older patients: A mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2429-2440, July.
    5. Carol Della Ratta, 2018. "The art of balance: Preceptors’ experiences of caring for deteriorating patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3497-3509, October.
    6. Qazi, Atika & Qazi, Javaria & Naseer, Khulla & Zeeshan, Muhammad & Qazi, Shiza & Abayomi-Alli, Olusola & Said Ahmad, Ibrahim & Darwich, Mohammad & Ali Talpur, Bandeh & Hardaker, Glenn & Naseem, Usman , 2021. "Adaption of distance learning to continue the academic year amid COVID-19 lockdown," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Dianne C Marshall & Mary P Finlayson, 2018. "Identifying the nontechnical skills required of nurses in general surgical wards," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1475-1487, April.
    8. Carol Della Ratta, 2016. "Challenging graduate nurses' transition: Care of the deteriorating patient," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 3036-3048, October.
    9. Claire Foley & Maura Dowling, 2019. "How do nurses use the early warning score in their practice? A case study from an acute medical unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1183-1192, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:5-6:p:664-675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.