IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i19-20p3497-3509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The art of balance: Preceptors’ experiences of caring for deteriorating patients

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Della Ratta

Abstract

Aim To explore nurse preceptors’ experiences of caring for deteriorating patients while providing guidance and supervision to a new graduate nurse. Background Fostering novice nurse development during high‐stakes encounters may be challenging for preceptors. Despite myriad preceptor literature, there is limited published research on experience of caring for deteriorating patients while serving as preceptor to a novice nurse. Design Qualitative interpretive phenomenological analysis. Method Data were collected through one‐on‐one, semistructured interviews between August 2016–September 2017 until data saturation occurred. Diekelmann's method was used to analyse the narratives of the purposive sample of 11 nurse preceptors. Results The findings reveal the experience of preceptors as they balanced their role as nurse with preceptor role to ensure patient safety and novice nurse development. Supporting the novice to care portrays the ways preceptors facilitated novice nurse development in caring for deteriorating patients. Impacting the preceptor role was remembering their own novice experience. Knowing when to step in was influenced by the preceptor's clinical expertise as they came to know (or not) when it was necessary for them to assume care of the patient. Debriefing: an essential preceptor tool emerged as a critical aspect of the experience to review technical aspects of care, vent emotions and provide evaluative feedback and reassurance to the novice. Conclusion Preceptors’ experiences of caring for deteriorating patients while precepting novice nurses require a balancing of roles to ensure patient safety and novice nurse development. Preceptors’ clinical expertise was critical in knowing when to step in and assume care of the patient. Relevance to clinical practice Caring for deteriorating patients while serving as preceptor to novice nurses requires clinical expertise to ensure patient safety and novice nurse development. Clinical leaders may use the findings from this study to improve preceptor development and support.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Della Ratta, 2018. "The art of balance: Preceptors’ experiences of caring for deteriorating patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3497-3509, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3497-3509
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14579
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy Purling & Lindy King, 2012. "A literature review: graduate nurses' preparedness for recognising and responding to the deteriorating patient," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(23-24), pages 3451-3465, December.
    2. Samantha McPhee & Nicole M Phillips & Cherene Ockerby & Alison M Hutchinson, 2017. "Multisource feedback to graduate nurses: a multimethod study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3442-3456, November.
    3. Ricardo M Padilla & Ann M Mayo, 2018. "Clinical deterioration: A concept analysis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1360-1368, April.
    4. Carol Della Ratta, 2016. "Challenging graduate nurses' transition: Care of the deteriorating patient," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 3036-3048, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth K. Herron, 2018. "New graduate nurses’ preparation for recognition and prevention of failure to rescue: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 390-401, January.
    2. Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Jonas Preposi Cruz & Meshrif Ahmad Bashtawi & Khalid Obaid Almutairi & Regie B. Tumala, 2021. "Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Competence and Attitudes towards Vital Signs Monitoring during Clinical Practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 664-675, March.
    3. Torunn Strømme & Karina Aase & Ingrid Tjoflåt, 2020. "Homecare professionals’ observation of deteriorating, frail older patients: A mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2429-2440, July.
    4. Chiew‐Jiat Siah & Fui‐Ping Lim & Siew‐Tiang Lau & Wilson Tam, 2021. "The use of the community of inquiry survey in blended learning pedagogy for a clinical skill‐based module," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 454-465, February.
    5. Anna Willman & Kaisa Bjuresäter & Jan Nilsson, 2021. "Insufficiently supported in handling responsibility and demands: Findings from a qualitative study of newly graduated nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 83-92, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3497-3509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.