IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1952-1965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the needs of parents who experience miscarriage in the emergency department: A qualitative study with parents and nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Tina Emond
  • Francine de Montigny
  • Laurence Guillaumie

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand how parents experienced miscarriage in an emergency department setting. Objectives were to identify parents’ needs, isolate factors that influenced their experience, and provide recommendations to improve care from the perspective of women, their partners, nurses and nurse managers. Background Miscarriage is the most prevalent complication encountered during pregnancy. It subjects parents to a multitude of emotions and may have significant consequences on mental health. Emergency department visits are frequently the only opportunity for parents to receive formal support during a miscarriage; it is thus crucial to understand the experiences of parents in this setting. Design The study employed a descriptive, exploratory, qualitative approach with semi‐structured interviews. Methods The study was founded on the W.K. Kellogg Foundation's Logic Model Development Guide (2004) and Meleis’ Transitions Theory (2015). A total of 26 participants were interviewed (17 parents, 7 emergency department nurses and 2 emergency department nurse managers). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research was used to report results. Results Three categories of needs were identified: physical health, cognitive and emotional. For instance, parents expressed a need to receive more information during their visit to the emergency department (i.e., a cognitive need), whether about the diagnostic test results or how to ensure a better recovery. Parents also reported a desire for professionals to address their emotional concerns. Nurses were aware of the emotional impact of miscarriage but felt that they were not adequately trained in providing optimal care to parents in this situation. Conclusions Parents who visited the emergency department for miscarriage reported several unfulfilled needs that generated dissatisfaction with care. Emergency department organisational constraints hindered optimal nursing care practices. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses have an important role to play in improving parents’ experience. They can do so by understanding the needs of parents and by being involved in developing new guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Tina Emond & Francine de Montigny & Laurence Guillaumie, 2019. "Exploring the needs of parents who experience miscarriage in the emergency department: A qualitative study with parents and nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1952-1965, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1952-1965
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14780
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emond, Tina & Guillaumie, Laurence & de Montigny, Francine, 2021. "Using a logic model to develop an intervention for improving miscarriage care in the emergency department," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Sara Fernández-Basanta & María-Jesús Movilla-Fernández & Carmen Coronado & Haizea Llorente-García & Terese Bondas, 2020. "Involuntary Pregnancy Loss and Nursing Care: A Meta-Ethnography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Ewa Rzońca & Agnieszka Bień & Grażyna Bączek & Patryk Rzońca & Michał Filip & Robert Gałązkowski, 2021. "Suspected Miscarriage in the Experience of Emergency Medical Services Teams—Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-10, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1952-1965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.