IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i19-20p3451-3458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The experience of advance care planning discussion among older residents in a long‐term care institution: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Sheng‐Yu Fan
  • Huei‐Chuan Sung
  • Shu‐Chen Wang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the experiences and processes of advance care planning (ACP) discussions in older residents of a long‐term care institution. Background Advance care planning can facilitate discussion about end‐of‐life care and help to identify individual's views, wishes and beliefs about dying at a time when they have the cognitive capacity to reflect on and/or make such decisions. Design A qualitative study was conducted. Methods Twenty‐eight older adults in a long‐term care institution participated in person‐to‐person interviews using an ACP booklet, which included topics such as life review, healthy habits and behaviours, and end‐of‐life care issues and information. The discussions were recorded, and thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist was followed. Results Three themes were identified. First, participants identified that ACP could help to ensure that they achieved their view of a “good death.” Second, the process of ACP bought up difficult decisions that many participants expressed uncertainty about making. Third, participants' ability and willingness to plan for end of life were shaped by considerations about their family members' needs, views and potential role as their future carer. Conclusions The ACP process involved not only personal ideas about good death but also families' concerns. Uncertainty and lack of information created difficult barriers. Relevance to clinical practice Healthcare professionals could address the concept of good death, deliver information for their concerns and promote communication with family members.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheng‐Yu Fan & Huei‐Chuan Sung & Shu‐Chen Wang, 2019. "The experience of advance care planning discussion among older residents in a long‐term care institution: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3451-3458, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3451-3458
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seymour, Jane & Gott, Merryn & Bellamy, Gary & Ahmedzai, Sam H. & Clark, David, 2004. "Planning for the end of life:: the views of older people about advance care statements," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 57-68, July.
    2. Bravo, Gina & Dubois, Marie-France & Wagneur, Bernard, 2008. "Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults: A systematic review and multi-level analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1122-1132, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malte Klemmt & Tanja Henking & Esther Heizmann & Lukas Best & Birgitt van Oorschot & Silke Neuderth, 2020. "Wishes and needs of nursing home residents and their relatives regarding end‐of‐life decision‐making and care planning—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2663-2674, July.
    2. Cheng-Pei Lin & Jen-Kuei Peng & Ping-Jen Chen & Hsien-Liang Huang & Su-Hsuan Hsu & Shao-Yi Cheng, 2020. "Preferences on the Timing of Initiating Advance Care Planning and Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment between Terminally-Ill Cancer Patients and Their Main Family Caregivers: A Prospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Wen-Yu & Huang, Chien-Hsun & Chiu, Tai-Yuan & Hung, Shou-Hung & Peng, Jen-Kuei & Chen, Ching-Yu, 2010. "Factors that influence the participation of healthcare professionals in advance care planning for patients with terminal cancer: A nationwide survey in Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1701-1704, June.
    2. Pollack, Keshia M. & Morhaim, Dan & Williams, Michael A., 2010. "The public's perspectives on advance directives: Implications for state legislative and regulatory policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 57-63, June.
    3. Sanders, Caroline & Rogers, Anne & Gately, Claire & Kennedy, Anne, 2008. "Planning for end of life care within lay-led chronic illness self-management training: The significance of 'death awareness' and biographical context in participant accounts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 982-993, February.
    4. Liz Crowe & Val Quinn & Lesley Chenoweth & Sanjeewa Kularatna & Jenny Boddy & Amanda J. Wheeler, 2015. "Advance Care Planning for Older Australians Living in the Community," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    5. Nicholson, C. & Meyer, J. & Flatley, M. & Holman, C. & Lowton, K., 2012. "Living on the margin: Understanding the experience of living and dying with frailty in old age," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1426-1432.
    6. Gott, M. & Small, Neil & Barnes, Sarah & Payne, Sheila & Seamark, David, 2008. "Older people's views of a good death in heart failure: Implications for palliative care provision," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1113-1121, October.
    7. Zivkovic, Tanya, 2018. "Forecasting and foreclosing futures: The temporal dissonance of advance care directives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 16-22.
    8. Zivkovic, Tanya, 2021. "About face: Relationalities of ageing and dying in Chinese migrant families," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    9. Abigail Wickson-Griffiths & Sharon Kaasalainen & Jenny Ploeg & Carrie McAiney, 2014. "A Review of Advance Care Planning Programs in Long-Term Care Homes: Are They Dementia Friendly?," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-11, March.
    10. Maciej Koniewski & Ilona Barańska & Violetta Kijowska & Jenny T. Steen & Anne B. Wichmann & Sheila Payne & Giovanni Gambassi & Nele Den Noortgate & Harriet Finne-Soveri & Tinne Smets & Lieve den Block, 2022. "Measuring relatives’ perceptions of end-of-life communication with physicians in five countries: a psychometric analysis," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1561-1570, December.
    11. Rebecca Aslakson & Anne Schuster & Judith Miller & Matthew Weiss & Angelo Volandes & John Bridges, 2014. "An Environmental Scan of Advance Care Planning Decision Aids for Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Study Protocol," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(2), pages 207-217, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3451-3458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.