IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i5-6p862-872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice

Author

Listed:
  • Kate Curtis
  • Margaret Fry
  • Ramon Z Shaban
  • Julie Considine

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the importance of, and methods for, successfully conducting and translating research into clinical practice. Background There is universal acknowledgement that the clinical care provided to individuals should be informed on the best available evidence. Knowledge and evidence derived from robust scholarly methods should drive our clinical practice, decisions and change to improve the way we deliver care. Translating research evidence to clinical practice is essential to safe, transparent, effective and efficient healthcare provision and meeting the expectations of patients, families and society. Despite its importance, translating research into clinical practice is challenging. There are more nurses in the frontline of health care than any other healthcare profession. As such, nurse‐led research is increasingly recognised as a critical pathway to practical and effective ways of improving patient outcomes. However, there are well‐established barriers to the conduct and translation of research evidence into practice. Design This clinical practice discussion paper interprets the knowledge translation literature for clinicians interested in translating research into practice. Methods This paper is informed by the scientific literature around knowledge translation, implementation science and clinician behaviour change, and presented from the nurse clinician perspective. We provide practical, evidence‐informed suggestions to overcome the barriers and facilitate enablers of knowledge translation. Examples of nurse‐led research incorporating the principles of knowledge translation in their study design that have resulted in improvements in patient outcomes are presented in conjunction with supporting evidence. Conclusions Translation should be considered in research design, including the end users and an evaluation of the research implementation. The success of research implementation in health care is dependent on clinician/consumer behaviour change and it is critical that implementation strategy includes this. Relevance to practice Translating best research evidence can make for a more transparent and sustainable healthcare service, to which nurses are central.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate Curtis & Margaret Fry & Ramon Z Shaban & Julie Considine, 2017. "Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5-6), pages 862-872, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:5-6:p:862-872
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13586
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verot, Elise & Régnier Denois, Véronique & Chauvin, Franck, 2021. "Current perceptions of cancer nurses in France about their role and the evolution of nursing practices: Findings and perspectives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Abdulellah Alotaibi & Leila Gholizadeh & Ali Hussein Alek Al‐Ganmi & Lin Perry, 2018. "Factors influencing nurses’ knowledge acquisition of diabetes care and its management: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4340-4352, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:5-6:p:862-872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.