IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p3893-3905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contributing factors for therapeutic diet adherence in patients receiving haemodialysis treatment: an integrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Lissete González Oquendo
  • José Miguel Morales Asencio
  • Candela Bonill de las Nieves

Abstract

Aims and objectives The objective of this integrative review is to identify the factors that contribute to diet adherence in people suffering from kidney disease who are receiving haemodialysis treatment. Background Adherence to the therapeutic regimen determines therapeutic success, quality of life and survival in patients on haemodialysis. Lack of diet adherence ranges from 25%–86% in patients receiving haemodialysis treatment and affects patient morbidity and mortality. Design An integrative literature review was conducted based on the criteria of Whittemore & Knafl. Methods A literature review was performed by two members of the team using twelve databases including PubMed, CUIDEN, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect. Results The main issues identified after analysing the results were as follows: the intrinsic barriers (age, dialysis time, motivation, perceived benefit, distorted perception of adherence) and facilitators (self‐efficacy, perception of disease, perception of control), extrinsic barriers (family dysfunction, lack of social support, cultural patterns of consumption of food) and facilitators (social support, relationship with healthcare providers), and interventions to encourage diet adherence, such as the use of motivational interviewing in educational interventions, and the training and education of relevant professionals in communication skills. Conclusions Diet nonadherence remains a serious health problem and suffers from a lack of solid criteria to identify this condition. The onset of depression signs and the level of social support available to the patient should be assessed, because these are important factors that determine adherence to treatment. Relevance to Clinical Practice Professionals should be trained in health education and communication techniques to contribute to the patient's self‐management and motivation for diet adherence. Controlled and randomised clinical studies involving predialysis stages should be performed to investigate the impact of the assessment and control of barriers to diet adherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Lissete González Oquendo & José Miguel Morales Asencio & Candela Bonill de las Nieves, 2017. "Contributing factors for therapeutic diet adherence in patients receiving haemodialysis treatment: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3893-3905, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3893-3905
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13804
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra L. Spoelstra & Monica Schueller & Melissa Hilton & Kimberly Ridenour, 2015. "Interventions combining motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour to promote medication adherence: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(9-10), pages 1163-1173, May.
    2. Ella Walsh & Elaine Lehane, 2011. "An exploration of the relationship between adherence with dietary sodium restrictions and health beliefs regarding these restrictions in Irish patients receiving haemodialysis for end‐stage renal dise," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3‐4), pages 331-340, February.
    3. Allen, Dawn & Wainwright, Megan & Hutchinson, Thomas, 2011. "'Non-compliance' as illness management: Hemodialysis patients' descriptions of adversarial patient-clinician interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 129-134, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evans, Susan H. & Clarke, Peter, 2019. "Resolving design issues in developing a nutrition app: A case study using formative research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 97-105.
    2. Geldine Chironda & Busisiwe Rosemary Bhengu, 2019. "Motivators of adherence to integrated management among patients with chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 63-70, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maya N. Clark-Cutaia & Mary Ann Sevick & Jennifer Thurheimer-Cacciotti & Leslie A. Hoffman & Linda Snetselaar & Lora E. Burke & Susan L. Zickmund, 2019. "Perceived Barriers to Adherence to Hemodialysis Dietary Recommendations," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(8), pages 1009-1029, November.
    2. Leting Isabella Hong & Wenru Wang & Ee Yuee Chan & Fatimah Mohamed & Hui‐Chen Chen, 2017. "Dietary and fluid restriction perceptions of patients undergoing haemodialysis: an exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3664-3676, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3893-3905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.