IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i15-16p2296-2305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oppression and exposure as differentiating predictors of types of workplace violence for nurses

Author

Listed:
  • John Rodwell
  • Defne Demir

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To extend a model of the antecedents of workplace bullying to apply to a wider range of types of workplace aggression, including bullying and several types of violence, among nurses. Background. Research that has focused on workplace bullying has found that the Demand‐Control‐Support model, negative affectivity and certain demographic factors play important roles as antecedents of bullying. Design. A cross‐sectional design. Methods. A validated questionnaire was sent to the work addresses of all nursing and midwifery staff in a medium‐to‐large hospital in Australia. A total of 273 nurses and midwives returned their completed questionnaires. Ordinal regressions were conducted to assess the antecedents of workplace aggression across bullying and violence. Results. Aspects of the Demand‐Control‐Support model and job tenure significantly predicted particular forms of violence, while negative affectivity and work schedule were significant for bullying. Conclusions. The patterns of the results suggest key mechanisms that characterise certain forms of violence and distinguish between bullying and types of violence across the range of workplace aggression. In particular, oppression and exposure appear to differentiate types of workplace violence. Relevance to clinical practice. The study suggests ways in which nursing and hospital managers may act to reduce the likelihood of certain forms of aggression, particularly violence, from occurring.

Suggested Citation

  • John Rodwell & Defne Demir, 2012. "Oppression and exposure as differentiating predictors of types of workplace violence for nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(15‐16), pages 2296-2305, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:15-16:p:2296-2305
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04192.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04192.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04192.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Queen Emwenkeke Usadolo & Yvonne Brunetto & Silvia Nelson & Patrick Gillett, 2022. "Connecting the Dots: Perceived Organization Support, Motive Fulfilment, Job Satisfaction, and Affective Commitment Among Volunteers," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    2. John Rodwell, 2017. "New development: Bullying in a reforming context—a holistic, layered model of the interpersonal interaction," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 357-362, July.
    3. Grigorovich, Alisa & Kontos, Pia, 2019. "A critical realist exploration of the vulnerability of staff to sexual harassment in residential long-term care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Shi‐Hong Zhao & Yu Shi & Zhi‐Nan Sun & Feng‐Zhe Xie & Jing‐Hui Wang & Shu‐E Zhang & Tian‐Yu Gou & Xuan‐Ye Han & Tao Sun & Li‐Hua Fan, 2018. "Impact of workplace violence against nurses’ thriving at work, job satisfaction and turnover intention: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2620-2632, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:15-16:p:2296-2305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.