IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jijmms/v2025y2025i1n4935567.html

Handling Imprecise Climate Information: A Neutrosophic Generalized Estimator Under Stratified Ranked Set Sampling for Population Mean

Author

Listed:
  • Anamika Kumari
  • Abhishek Singh
  • Vishwajeet Singh

Abstract

Researchers under classical statistics often rely on precise, determinate data to estimate population parameters. However, in certain situations, data may be indeterminate or imprecise. Traditional approaches often fail to manage the complexities of uncertainty, necessitating the development of advanced methodologies like neutrosophic statistics. To address these challenges by handling vague, indeterminate, and uncertain information effectively, the study employed an entirely novel sampling technique known as “neutrosophic stratified ranked set sampling” and designed specialized neutrosophic estimators to enhance the accuracy of population mean estimation under uncertainty. This study developed neutrosophic generalized estimators that incorporate auxiliary information within the stratified ranked set sampling framework, leading to more precise population mean estimation under ambiguous conditions. Theoretical assessments included the derivation of bias and mean squared error (MSE) equations for these estimators, providing deeper insight into their efficiency. The performance of the proposed estimator was evaluated using simulated data using the R programming language as well as real‐world datasets with indeterminate data, including relative humidity. The results demonstrated that the new estimators outperformed traditional methods in terms of MSE and percentage relative efficiency (PRE), highlighting their superior accuracy. By producing interval‐based results, the proposed methodology provided a more comprehensive representation of uncertainty in population parameter estimation. This, along with reduced MSE, significantly improved the estimators’ reliability. The empirical validation, supported by numerical experiments and simulations conducted in R, further reinforces the practicality and robustness of the proposed methods, affirming their relevance for real‐world applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Anamika Kumari & Abhishek Singh & Vishwajeet Singh, 2025. "Handling Imprecise Climate Information: A Neutrosophic Generalized Estimator Under Stratified Ranked Set Sampling for Population Mean," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2025(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jijmms:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:4935567
    DOI: 10.1155/ijmm/4935567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/ijmm/4935567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/ijmm/4935567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. I. Al‐Omari & C. N. Bouza, 2015. "Ratio estimators of the population mean with missing values using ranked set sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 67-76, March.
    2. Cem Kadilar & Yesim Unyazici & Hulya Cingi, 2009. "Ratio estimator for the population mean using ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 301-309, March.
    3. Bavita Singh & Abhishek Singh & Florentin Smarandache, 2025. "A Family of Neutrosophic Estimators for Estimating Mean: An Application to Real Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 87(2), pages 712-741, November.
    4. Hani M. Samawi & Mahmoud I. Siam, 2003. "Ratio estimation using stratified ranked set sample," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(1), pages 75-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. K. Yadav & Gajendra K. Vishwakarma & Abhishek Singh, 2025. "Efficient Searls predictive estimators for the computation of mean under ranked set sampling: an application to COVID-19 data," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(3), pages 1040-1057, March.
    2. Jingli Lu, 2013. "The Chain Ratio Estimator and Regression Estimator with Linear Combination of Two Auxiliary Variables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-4, November.
    3. Jesse Frey & Timothy G. Feeman, 2017. "Efficiency comparisons for partially rank-ordered set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1149-1163, December.
    4. Shashi Bhushan & Anoop Kumar, 2022. "Novel Log Type Class Of Estimators Under Ranked Set Sampling," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 421-447, May.
    5. Sayed A. Mostafa & Thomas Johnson & Sanford Jennings, 2025. "Composite Estimators for the Population Mean Under Ranked Set Sampling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Sanjay Kumar & Shivanshu Kumar & Evrim Oral, 2021. "Robust Ratio- and Product-Type Estimators Under Non-normality via Linear Transformation Using Certain Known Population Parameters," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 733-753, December.
    7. Mariano Ruiz Espejo & Miguel Delgado Pineda & Saralees Nadarajah, 2013. "Optimal unbiased estimation of some population central moments," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 71(1), pages 39-62, June.
    8. Ehsan Zamanzade & Michael Vock, 2018. "Some nonparametric tests of perfect judgment ranking for judgment post stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1085-1100, September.
    9. Amer Ibrahim Al-Omari & SidAhmed Benchiha & Ibrahim M. Almanjahie, 2022. "Efficient Estimation of Two-Parameter Xgamma Distribution Parameters Using Ranked Set Sampling Design," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-18, September.
    10. M. De la Sen & J. C. Soto & A. Ibeas, 2012. "Stability and Limit Oscillations of a Control Event‐Based Sampling Criterion," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2012(1).
    11. Anoop Kumar & Shashi Bhushan, 2025. "Logarithmic imputation techniques for temporal surveys: a memory-based approach explored through simulation and real-life applications," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 2707-2731, June.
    12. Bavita Singh & Abhishek Singh & Florentin Smarandache, 2025. "A Family of Neutrosophic Estimators for Estimating Mean: An Application to Real Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 87(2), pages 712-741, November.
    13. Ehsan Zamanzade, 2019. "EDF-based tests of exponentiality in pair ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2141-2159, December.
    14. Mohammad Jafari Jozani & Saeed Majidi & François Perron, 2012. "Unbiased and almost unbiased ratio estimators of the population mean in ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 719-737, August.
    15. Cem Kadilar & Yesim Unyazici & Hulya Cingi, 2009. "Ratio estimator for the population mean using ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 301-309, March.
    16. Sweta Shukla & Abhishek Singh & Gajendra K. Vishwakarma, 2025. "Predictive estimation for mean under median ranked set sampling: an application to COVID-19 data," Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 218-229, March.
    17. Shashi Bhushan & Anoop Kumar & Usman Shahzad & Amer Ibrahim Al-Omari & Ibrahim Mufrah Almanjahie, 2022. "On Some Improved Class of Estimators by Using Stratified Ranked Set Sampling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-32, September.
    18. V.L. Mandowara & Nitu Mehta (Ranka), 2012. "A better estimator of population mean with power transformation based on ranked set sampling," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 13(3), pages 551-558, December.
    19. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2022. "New insights on goodness-of-fit tests for ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1777-1799, December.
    20. A. Hussein & H. Muttlak & E. Al-Sawi, 2013. "Group sequential methods based on ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 547-562, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jijmms:v:2025:y:2025:i:1:n:4935567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/6396 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.