IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v5y1996i3p165-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Expert System Approach to Audit Planning and Evaluation in the Belief‐Function Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Rajendra P. Srivastava
  • Saurav K. Dutta
  • Robert W. Johns

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to discuss an expert system approach for audit planning and evaluation using belief functions. First, we show how to use belief functions to represent strengths of various types of evidence such as positive, negative, or mixed items of evidence in an audit. The situation where one item of evidence relates to more than one audit objective or account is of special interest here, particularly the evidence that provides different levels of support to different audit objectives or accounts. Second, we illustrate the use of Auditor's Assistant, an expert system shell, for planning and evaluation of an audit. For this illustration, we use an actual audit program of one of the Big Six accounting firms for the accounts receivable account of a health care unit. Third, two types of sensitivity analyses are performed on the evidential network (audit program) created above. The first one determines the effects of the location of evidence in the network and the second one deals with the effects of variations in the auditor's judgment of the strength of evidence on the overall belief on each variable in the network. Finally, practical implications of the findings of the sensitivity analyses are discussed in the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajendra P. Srivastava & Saurav K. Dutta & Robert W. Johns, 1996. "An Expert System Approach to Audit Planning and Evaluation in the Belief‐Function Framework," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(3), pages 165-183, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:5:y:1996:i:3:p:165-183
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199609)5:33.0.CO;2-E
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199609)5:33.0.CO;2-E
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199609)5:33.0.CO;2-E?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William F. Messier & James V. Hansen, 1992. "A Case Study and Field Evaluation of EDP‐XPERT," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(3), pages 173-185, September.
    2. Hansen, James V. & Messier, William F., 1986. "A knowledge-based expert system for auditing advanced computer systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 371-379, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel E. O'Leary, 2010. "Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management: ISI journal and proceeding citations, and research issues from most‐cited papers," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 41-58, January.
    2. Daniel E. O'Leary, 2009. "Downloads and citations in Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1‐2), pages 21-31, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary Jane Lenard & Pervaiz Alam & David Booth & Gregory Madey, 2001. "Decision‐making capabilities of a hybrid system applied to the auditor's going‐concern assessment," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Siskos, Y. & Spyridakos, A., 1999. "Intelligent multicriteria decision support: Overview and perspectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 236-246, March.
    3. William F. Messier & James V. Hansen, 1992. "A Case Study and Field Evaluation of EDP‐XPERT," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(3), pages 173-185, September.
    4. Wong, Bo K. & Monaco, John A., 1995. "A bibliography of expert system applications for business (1984-1992)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 416-432, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:5:y:1996:i:3:p:165-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.