IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v3y1994i1p47-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SCAN: A Case‐Based Reasoning Model for Generating Information System Control Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Bonnie W. Morris

Abstract

This paper describes SCAN, a case‐based reasoning model for generating information system control recommendations. The purpose of the paper is to explain how a case‐based reasoner may be used to support inexperienced information system auditors in evaluating controls and proposing audit recommendations. As a case‐based reasoner, SCAN functions by reasoning by analogy to similar past cases. SCAN models audit experience as traces of past cases which are stored in a case knowledge base. In addition to a database of past audit cases, SCAN consists of indices for storing and retrieving cases, a similarity metric for measuring case similarity, and rules for using similar cases to generate control recommendations. SCAN uses past cases to remind the user of previous control failures, to set expectations about case features and controls, to use as a pattern against which to compare a client's controls and to help justify or explain its recommendations. SCAN's recommendations were judged to be more like those of an experienced auditor than either a student or a textbook model.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonnie W. Morris, 1994. "SCAN: A Case‐Based Reasoning Model for Generating Information System Control Recommendations," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(1), pages 47-63, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:3:y:1994:i:1:p:47-63
    DOI: 10.1002/j.1099-1174.1994.tb00054.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1099-1174.1994.tb00054.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/j.1099-1174.1994.tb00054.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biggs, Sf & Mock, Tj, 1983. "An Investigation Of Auditor Decision-Processes In The Evaluation Of Internal Controls And Audit Scope Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 234-255.
    2. Waller, William S. & Felix, William Jr., 1984. "The auditor and learning from experience: Some conjectures," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(3-4), pages 383-406, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel E. O'Leary, 2010. "Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management: ISI journal and proceeding citations, and research issues from most‐cited papers," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 41-58, January.
    2. Wei Li & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Stefan Lessmann, 2022. "A Data-driven Case-based Reasoning in Bankruptcy Prediction," Papers 2211.00921, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kida, Thomas & Smith, James F., 1995. "The encoding and retrieval of numerical data for decision making in accounting contexts: Model development," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(7-8), pages 585-610.
    2. Sezen Uludag, 2016. "The importance of control environment in an organization for an independent auditor to determine nature,timing, and extent of substantive tests: An application in Turkey," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(6), pages 294-303.
    3. G. Schneider, Linda & Selling, Thomas I., 1996. "A comparison of compensatory and noncompensatory models of judgment: Effects of task predictability and degrees of freedom," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 3-22, January.
    4. Dilla, William N. & Raschke, Robyn L., 2015. "Data visualization for fraud detection: Practice implications and a call for future research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 1-22.
    5. Ye, Kangtao & Cheng, Yingli & Gao, Jingyu, 2014. "How individual auditor characteristics impact the likelihood of audit failure: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 394-401.
    6. Gemünden, Hans Georg, 1986. "The impact of information presentation on the efficiency of managerial decisions," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 186, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    7. Owhoso, Vincent & Weickgenannt, Andrea, 2009. "Auditors’ self-perceived abilities in conducting domain audits," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-21.
    8. Peecher, Mark E. & Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2013. "An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 596-620.
    9. Steven Salterio, 1994. "Researching for Accounting Precedents: Learning, Efficiency, and Effectiveness," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 515-542, June.
    10. Bierstaker, James L. & Kopp, Lori S. & Lombardi, Danielle R., 2016. "Are financial professionals ready for IFRS?: An exploratory study," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 1-7.
    11. Patrick W. Leung & Ken T. Trotman, 2008. "Effect of different types of feedback on the level of auditors’ configural information processing," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(2), pages 301-318, June.
    12. Rajni Mala & Parmod Chand, 2015. "Judgment and Decision‐Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-50, March.
    13. Kwok, Helen, 2002. "The effect of cash flow statement format on lenders' decisions," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 347-362.
    14. Samsonova, Anna, 2009. "Local sites of globalisation: A look at the development of a legislative framework for auditing in Russia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 528-552.
    15. Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2003. "Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: the first 25 years of AOS," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 395-412, May.
    16. Simnett, Roger, 1996. "The effect of information selection, information processing and task complexity on predictive accuracy of auditors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 699-719.
    17. Craig Emby & Michael Gibbins, 1987. "Good judgment in public accounting: Quality and justification," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 287-313, September.
    18. Barrick, John A. & Spilker, Brian C., 2003. "The relations between knowledge, search strategy, and performance in unaided and aided information search," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Cindy Moeckel & Joanne Deahl Williams, 1990. "The role of source availability in inference verification," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 850-858, March.
    20. Bamber, E. Michael & Ramsay, Robert J. & Tubbs, Richard M., 1997. "An examination of the descriptive validity of the belief-adjustment model and alternative attitudes to evidence in auditing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(3-4), pages 249-268.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:3:y:1994:i:1:p:47-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.