IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v2y1993i3p217-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The rand 36‐item health survey 1.0

Author

Listed:
  • Ron D. Hays
  • Cathy Donald Sherbourne
  • Rebecca M. Mazel

Abstract

Recently, Ware and Sherbourne1 published a new short‐form health survey, the MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36), consisting of 36 items included in long‐form measures developed for the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF‐36 taps eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, general mental health, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in health. The SF‐36 items and scoring rules are distributed by MOS Trust, Inc. Strict adherence to item wording and scoring recommendations is required in order to use the SF‐36 trademark. The RAND 36‐Item Health Survey 1.0 (distributed by RAND) includes the same items as those in the SF‐36, but the recommended scoring algorithm is somewhat different from that of the SF‐36. Scoring differences are discussed here and new T‐scores are presented for the 8 multi‐item scales and two factor analytically‐derived physical and mental health composite scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron D. Hays & Cathy Donald Sherbourne & Rebecca M. Mazel, 1993. "The rand 36‐item health survey 1.0," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(3), pages 217-227, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:2:y:1993:i:3:p:217-227
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4730020305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730020305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4730020305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geunpil Ryu & Kwang Bin Bae, 2020. "Do Public-Sector Employees Have More Psychological Wellness than Private-Sector Counterparts?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Thompson, Tess & Rodebaugh, Thomas L. & Pérez, Maria & Struthers, James & Sefko, Julianne A. & Lian, Min & Schootman, Mario & Jeffe, Donna B., 2016. "Influence of neighborhood-level factors on social support in early-stage breast cancer patients and controls," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 55-63.
    3. Thompson, Tess & Pérez, Maria & Yan, Yan & Kreuter, Matthew W. & Margenthaler, Julie A. & Colditz, Graham A. & Jeffe, Donna B., 2021. "Randomized controlled trial of a breast cancer Survivor Stories intervention for African American women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Foggin, Peter M. & Torrance, Marion E. & Dorje, Drashi & Xuri, Wenzha & Marc Foggin, J. & Torrance, Jane, 2006. "Assessment of the health status and risk factors of Kham Tibetan pastoralists in the alpine grasslands of the Tibetan plateau," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2512-2532, November.
    5. Graeme Tucker & Robert Adams & David Wilson, 2013. "Observed Agreement Problems between Sub-Scales and Summary Components of the SF-36 Version 2 - An Alternative Scoring Method Can Correct the Problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10, April.
    6. Ackerman, Adam & Porter, Ben, 2022. "The effect of combat exposure on financial problems," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 241-257.
    7. Nahla M. Al Ali & Amjad Eid & Nabela Aljada, 2023. "Determinants of Quality of Life in Family Caregivers of Patients With Leukemia: A Cross-Sectional Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    8. Thomas Tanner & Lindsey Jones, 2015. "Measuring ‘Subjective Resilience’ – Using People’s Perceptions to Quantify Household Resilience," Working Papers id:7252, eSocialSciences.
    9. Ackerman, Adam & Porter, Ben & Sullivan, Ryan, 2020. "The effect of combat exposure on veteran homelessness," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    10. Christian Raschke, 2019. "Unexpected windfalls, education, and mental health: evidence from lottery winners in Germany," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 207-218, January.
    11. Thompson, Tess & Pérez, Maria & Kreuter, Matthew & Margenthaler, Julie & Colditz, Graham & Jeffe, Donna B., 2017. "Perceived social support in African American breast cancer patients: Predictors and effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 134-142.
    12. Alec Bernard & Sara Weiss & Joshua D. Stein & Sheryl S. Ulin & Clive D’Souza & Anah Salgat & Kate Panzer & Anne Riddering & Paul Edwards & Michelle Meade & Michael M. McKee & Joshua R. Ehrlich, 2020. "Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on persons with disabilities: development of a novel survey," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(6), pages 755-757, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:2:y:1993:i:3:p:217-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.