IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v14y2024i2p256-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CO2 dynamic mass balance of low permeability reservoir based on “four regions”

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaofan Chen
  • Jian Wang
  • Qingzhen Fan
  • Rujie Zhang
  • Ping Yue
  • Jian Li

Abstract

In order to limit the increase in global average temperature to 1.5°C, it is necessary to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 45% by 2030. CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) is one of the effective ways to reduce CO2 emissions. Geological storage of CO2 provides a solution with the lowest economic cost and the fastest effect for reducing CO2 emissions. This article proposes a CO2 storage regional division method based on the characteristics of low‐permeability reservoirs in the Yanchang W oilfield in China. The storage space is divided into four regions: gas phase region, two‐phase or near‐miscible region, diffusion region, and oil phase region. As the displacement progresses, the volume of the gas phase region and the two‐phase or near‐miscible region gradually increases; the volume of the diffusion region first increases and then decreases. By calculating the storage capacity of each region separately, the total storage capacity is finally calculated. The impact of different pressures and injection rates on dynamic CO2 storage capacity was evaluated. The results show that pressure and injection rate are positively correlated with total storage capacity. When CO2 miscible conditions are reached, the increase in total storage capacity will significantly decrease. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaofan Chen & Jian Wang & Qingzhen Fan & Rujie Zhang & Ping Yue & Jian Li, 2024. "CO2 dynamic mass balance of low permeability reservoir based on “four regions”," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 14(2), pages 256-269, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:256-269
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2262
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon McBean, 2004. "Climate Change and Extreme Weather: A Basis for Action," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 31(1), pages 177-190, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gowhar Meraj & Shakil Romshoo & A. Yousuf & Sadaff Altaf & Farrukh Altaf, 2015. "Assessing the influence of watershed characteristics on the flood vulnerability of Jhelum basin in Kashmir Himalaya," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(1), pages 153-175, May.
    2. Patricio Valdivieso & Krister P. Andersson, 2018. "What Motivates Local Governments to Invest in Critical Infrastructure? Lessons from Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Melanie Gall & Kevin A. Borden & Christopher T. Emrich & Susan L. Cutter, 2011. "The Unsustainable Trend of Natural Hazard Losses in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(11), pages 1-25, November.
    4. Lisa Dilling & Elise Pizzi & John Berggren & Ashwin Ravikumar & Krister Andersson, 2017. "Drivers of adaptation: Responses to weather- and climate-related hazards in 60 local governments in the Intermountain Western U.S," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(11), pages 2628-2648, November.
    5. Benedikt Heil & Ingo Petzold & Hans Romang & Josef Hess, 2014. "The common information platform for natural hazards in Switzerland," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(3), pages 1673-1687, February.
    6. Adam Smith & Katie Jenkins, 2013. "Climate change and extreme weather in the USA: discourse analysis and strategies for an emerging ‘public’," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 3(3), pages 259-268, September.
    7. Huijun Zhang & Mingjie Zhang & Ran Yi & Yaxin Liu & Qiuzi Han Wen & Xin Meng, 2024. "Growing Importance of Micro-Meteorology in the New Power System: Review, Analysis and Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-33, March.
    8. Stefan Kienzle, 2006. "The Use of the Recession Index as an Indicator for Streamflow Recovery After a Multi-Year Drought," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(6), pages 991-1006, December.
    9. Sarah P. Church & Michael Dunn & Nicholas Babin & Amber Saylor Mase & Tonya Haigh & Linda S. Prokopy, 2018. "Do advisors perceive climate change as an agricultural risk? An in-depth examination of Midwestern U.S. Ag advisors’ views on drought, climate change, and risk management," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 349-365, June.
    10. P. Leviäkangas & S. Michaelides, 2014. "Transport system management under extreme weather risks: views to project appraisal, asset value protection and risk-aware system management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 72(1), pages 263-286, May.
    11. Shu, Wenjun & Fan, Di, 2024. "How do firms perceive and react to extreme weather risk in their supply bases?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:256-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.