IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i4p697-711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurements of the relative permeability to CO2‐and‐brine multiphase fluid of Paaratte formation at near‐reservoir conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Pengyu Huang
  • Luming Shen
  • Yixiang Gan
  • Yinjie Shen
  • Dongxing Du
  • Bowei Yu
  • Federico Maggi
  • Abbas El‐Zein

Abstract

CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers is a promising method to reduce atmospheric CO2. The on‐going CO2CRC Otway project aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of large‐scale CO2 storage in deep saline formations and to develop new monitoring technologies in Australia. The relative permeability curves are essential for predicting the movements of CO2 and estimate residual trapping in the aquifer during and after injection through numerical simulations. However, studies of relative permeability curves for the Paaratte sandstone at the in situ conditions are limited. In addition, different rock types in the Paaratte formation can behave differently when CO2 displaces brine. This work reports four relative permeability experiments of CO2/brine systems using the unsteady‐state core flooding method for different types of rock collected from various depths of Paaratte formations at near‐reservoir conditions. The relative permeability results calculated from the analytical Johnson, Bossler, and Naumann (JBN) method and the numerical history matching method are compared. The JBN method does not calculate the relative permeability accurately for CO2/brine systems due to the assumptions of incompressible flow, since the CO2 relative permeability results calculated from the JBN method are similar for all the cases. The history matching results show that the brine (water) relative permeability of the core samples with a high fraction of macropores is similar to the measurements for Paaratte formation reported in the literature over a large range of brine (water) saturation. In contrast, the brine relative permeability of the core samples with a high fraction of micropores is considerably higher than that of the core samples with macropores, suggesting better connectivity for the samples with a high fraction of micropores. The new findings will be useful in reservoir‐scale numerical modelings of the Paaratte formation to more accurately predict the movement of CO2 during and after the injection. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengyu Huang & Luming Shen & Yixiang Gan & Yinjie Shen & Dongxing Du & Bowei Yu & Federico Maggi & Abbas El‐Zein, 2021. "Measurements of the relative permeability to CO2‐and‐brine multiphase fluid of Paaratte formation at near‐reservoir conditions," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 697-711, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:697-711
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeong, Gu Sun & Lee, Jaehyoung & Ki, Seil & Huh, Dae-Gee & Park, Chan-Hee, 2017. "Effects of viscosity ratio, interfacial tension and flow rate on hysteric relative permeability of CO2/brine systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 62-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meiheriayi Mutailipu & Qingnan Xue & Tao Li & Yande Yang & Fusheng Xue, 2023. "Thermodynamic Properties of a Gas–Liquid–Solid System during the CO 2 Geological Storage and Utilization Process: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Tian, Weibing & Wu, Keliu & Chen, Zhangxin & Gao, Yanling & Li, Jing & Wang, Muyuan, 2022. "A relative permeability model considering nanoconfinement and dynamic contact angle effects for tight reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Jayasekara, D.W. & Ranjith, P.G. & Wanniarachchi, W.A.M. & Rathnaweera, T.D. & Chaudhuri, A., 2020. "Effect of salinity on supercritical CO2 permeability of caprock in deep saline aquifers: An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Park, Chan-Hee & Lee, Seong Kon & Lee, Cholwoo & Kim, Seong-Kyun, 2018. "Applicability of thermal response tests for assessing in-situ CO2 storage in a saline aquifer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 210-220.
    5. Gu Sun Jeong & Seil Ki & Dae Sung Lee & Ilsik Jang, 2021. "Effect of the Flow Rate on the Relative Permeability Curve in the CO 2 and Brine System for CO 2 Sequestration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:697-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.