IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v11y2004i1p48-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different approaches to standardized environmental management systems in local authorities – two case studies in Gothenburg and Newcastle

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Emilsson
  • Olof Hjelm

Abstract

Local authorities have shown an increased interest in committing to voluntary environmental commitment. This paper analyses the use of one of them, standardized environmental management systems (EMSs). It examines how local authorities approach EMS implementation, using two case studies in two European cities, Newcastle City Council (UK) and Gothenburg City Council (Sweden). The research departs from four research topics: drivers; strategy for EMS implementation; integration, dissemination and acceptance; future development of the EMS work. The case study cities' EMS approaches are analysed starting from the three pillars of institutions: the regulative, normative and cultural–cognitive. The analyses reveal that both Newcastle and Gothenburg mainly use a normative approach to EMS implementation; however, there is a regulative inclination in Newcastle's approach. It has also been noted that there is a difference between the standards (e.g. ISO 14001 and EMAS) and the actual use of the standards. The standards are fairly regulative while the application of the standards varies from organization to organization. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Emilsson & Olof Hjelm, 2004. "Different approaches to standardized environmental management systems in local authorities – two case studies in Gothenburg and Newcastle," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 48-60, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:11:y:2004:i:1:p:48-60
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.54
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.54?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Emilsson & Olof Hjelm, 2002. "Mapping environmental management system initiatives in Swedish local authorities—a national survey," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 107-115, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos & Joaquim Gonçalves, 2020. "Critical analysis of information about integrated management systems and environmental policy on the Portuguese firms' website, towards sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1069-1088, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin, 2011. "The effects of value on the perception of corporate social responsibility implementation: A study of Chinese youth," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 246-262, July.
    2. Hanna Norén & Fredrik von Malmborg, 2004. "Are standardized EMSs useful in local authorities? A study of how a tool from the private sector is used in the public sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 187-197, May.
    3. Sara Emilsson & Olof Hjelm, 2005. "Development of the use of standardized environmental management systems (EMSs) in local authorities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 144-156, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:11:y:2004:i:1:p:48-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.