IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v8y1991i1p223-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compétence et qualité des décisions de vérification

Author

Listed:
  • JEAN BÉDARD

Abstract

Résumé. L'auteur étudie l'incidence de la compétence sur la qualité de la prise de décisions de vérification dans le contexte de la planification de la vérification. Contrairement aux chercheurs qui se sont, jusqu'à maintenant, penchés sur cette question, il mesure la compétence par rapport à des champs de connaissances précis. Il évalue la qualité de la prise de décisions de vérification en fonction de trois critères: la conformité aux normes de la profession, la conformité aux normes du cabinet et le degré de consensus parmi les vérificateurs. Dans l'ensemble, les résultats de l'analyse permettent de conclure que la qualité de la prise de décisions, au sens que lui donne l'auteur, est supérieure chez les vérificateurs expérimentés par rapport aux vérificateurs inexpérimentés. Plus particulièrement, il semble, en premier lieu, que les vérificateurs expérimentés comme les vérificateurs inexpérimentés possèdent un bagage de connaissances minimum et se conforment aux normes de la profession. En second lieu, les vérificateurs expérimentés se conforment davantage aux normes du cabinet, tant en ce qui a trait aux décisions relatives à la confiance à accorder au contrôle interne qu'aux décisions de corroboration, ce qui indique que les connaissances des vérificateurs expérimentés seraient plus approfondies que celles des vérificateurs inexpérimentés. Enfin, le degré de consensus chez les vérificateurs expérimentés est supérieur à celui qu'on retrouve chez les vérificateurs inexpérimentés en situation de vérification normale, bien que dans les situations plus inhabituelles, le degré de consensus soit plus faible chez les vérificateurs expérimentés.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Bã‰Dard, 1991. "Compétence et qualité des décisions de vérification," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 223-252, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:8:y:1991:i:1:p:223-252
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1991.tb00843.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1991.tb00843.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1991.tb00843.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joyce, Ej, 1976. "Expert Judgment In Audit Program Planning," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14, pages 29-60.
    2. Gaumnitz, Br & Nunamaker, Tr & Surdick, Jj & Thomas, Mf, 1982. "Auditor Consensus In Internal Control Evaluation And Audit Program-Planning," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 745-755.
    3. Ashton, Rh, 1974. "Experimental Study Of Internal Control Judgments," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 143-157.
    4. Nanni, Alfred Jr., 1984. "An exploration of the mediating effects of auditor experience and position in internal accounting control evaluation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 149-163, June.
    5. Frederick, Dm & Libby, R, 1986. "Expertise And Auditors Judgments Of Conjunctive Events," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 270-290.
    6. Gibbins, M, 1984. "Propositions About The Psychology Of Professional Judgment In Public Accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 103-125.
    7. Weber, R, 1980. "Some Characteristics Of The Free-Recall Of Computer Controls By Edp Auditors," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 214-241.
    8. Hamilton, Re & Wright, Wf, 1982. "Internal Control Judgments And Effects Of Experience - Replications And Extensions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 756-765.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean Bã‰Dard, 1991. "Expertise and Its Relation to Audit Decision Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 198-222, September.
    2. Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2003. "Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: the first 25 years of AOS," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 395-412, May.
    3. W. Robert Knechel & William F. Messier, 1990. "Sequential auditor decision making: Information search and evidence evaluation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 386-406, March.
    4. Sadok Mansour, 2007. "Modelisation Du Risque Dans Les Methodologies D'Audit : Apport Des De La Psychometrie," Post-Print halshs-00543217, HAL.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3528 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. E. Michael Bamber & Joseph H. Bylinski, 1987. "The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers' review time judgments," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 127-143, September.
    7. Dezoort, F. T., 1998. "An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Brown, Lawrence D., 1996. "Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 723-754.
    9. Dean A. Shepherd & Dawn R. DeTienne, 2005. "Prior Knowledge, Potential Financial Reward, and Opportunity Identification," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(1), pages 91-112, January.
    10. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    11. Shepherd, Dean A. & Zacharakis, Andrew, 2002. "Venture capitalists' expertise: A call for research into decision aids and cognitive feedback," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Jefim Efrim Boritz, 1985. "The effect of information presentation structures on audit planning and review judgments," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 193-218, March.
    13. Owhoso, Vincent & Weickgenannt, Andrea, 2009. "Auditors’ self-perceived abilities in conducting domain audits," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 3-21.
    14. Shepherd, Dean A. & Zacharakis, Andrew & Baron, Robert A., 2003. "VCs' decision processes: Evidence suggesting more experience may not always be better," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 381-401, May.
    15. Peter Best, 2000. "Auditing SAP R/3 – Control Risk Assessment," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 10(22), pages 31-42, November.
    16. Olga Pilipczuk, 2020. "Toward Cognitive Management Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Trotman, Ken T. & Bauer, Tim D. & Humphreys, Kerry A., 2015. "Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Past and future research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 56-72.
    18. Yongliang Wu & Zihui Li & Min Zhang & Shengbao Zhai, 2023. "Auditor Assignments and Audit Quality," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 160-187, June.
    19. Simnett, Roger, 1996. "The effect of information selection, information processing and task complexity on predictive accuracy of auditors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 699-719.
    20. Craig Emby & Michael Gibbins, 1987. "Good judgment in public accounting: Quality and justification," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 287-313, September.
    21. Sarah Bonner, 1991. "Is experience necessary in cue measurement? The case of auditing tasks," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 253-269, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:8:y:1991:i:1:p:223-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.