IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v4y1987i1p111-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic inference in performance evaluation: effects of cause and event covariation and similarity

Author

Listed:
  • CLIFTON BROWN

Abstract

. This study experimentally tests some implications of psychological diagnostic inference theories and begins to extend these theories into a performance evaluation context. Subjects, who were required to assume the role of a manufacturing division manager, were asked to estimate the likelihoods of four potential causes of an assembly department's labor efficiency variance. The subjects were asked to reevaluate their causal likelihoods following: 1) evidence concerning the magnitude of the labor variance and the deviations of the four potential causes from their normal levels (similarity evidence) and 2) evidence concerning the covariation of a potential cause, and labor efficiency variances over the past five years (covariation evidence). The results generally confirmed a set of hypotheses predicting the effects of cause/event similarity and covariation upon individuals' causal inferences. Implications of these results for accounting information systems design are discussed in a concluding section. Résumé. Cette étude teste, au moyen d'une expérience, quelques†unes des conclusions des théories d'inférence diagnostique psychologique et amorce l'application de ces théories dans un contexte d'évaluation de la performance. Les sujets, qui devaient assumer le rôle de directeur d'une division de fabrication, ont été invités à estimer les probabilités de quatre causes possibles de l'écart de rendement sur main†d'œuvre d'un atelier d'assemblage. Les sujets furent invités à réévaluer leurs probabilités causales selon: 1) des informations relatives à l'ampleur de l'écart sur main†d'œuvre et à la dispersion des quatre causes potentielles par rapport à leur niveau normal (preuve de similitude) et 2) des informations relatives à la co†variation d'une cause potentielle, et aux écarts de rendement sur maind'œuvre des cinq dernières années (preuve de co†variation). De façon générale, les résultats confirment l'ensemble des hypothèses prévoyant les effets de similitude et de co†variation cause/événement sur les inférences causales des individus. Les conséquences de ces résultats sur la conception des systèmes d'information comptable sont examinées dans la conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Clifton Brown, 1987. "Diagnostic inference in performance evaluation: effects of cause and event covariation and similarity," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 111-126, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:4:y:1987:i:1:p:111-126
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1987.tb00658.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1987.tb00658.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1987.tb00658.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Clifton, 1985. "Causal reasoning in performance assessment: Effects of cause and effect temporal order and covariation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 255-266, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koonce, Lisa & Seybert, Nick & Smith, James, 2011. "Causal reasoning in financial reporting and voluntary disclosure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 209-225.
    2. Dalla Via, Nicola & Perego, Paolo & van Rinsum, Marcel, 2019. "How accountability type influences information search processes and decision quality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 79-91.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emsley, David, 2000. "Variance analysis and performance: two empirical studies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Koonce, Lisa & Seybert, Nick & Smith, James, 2011. "Causal reasoning in financial reporting and voluntary disclosure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 209-225.
    3. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    4. Luft, Joan, 2016. "Management accounting in the laboratory and in social context: Four contrasts, 1975–2014," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 9-20.
    5. R B van der Meer & J Quigley & J E Storbeck, 2005. "Using data envelopment analysis to model the performance of UK coastguard centres," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 889-901, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:4:y:1987:i:1:p:111-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.