IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v34y2017i4p2022-2050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dividend Stickiness, Debt Covenants, and Earnings Management

Author

Listed:
  • Jaewoo Kim
  • Kyeong Hun Lee
  • Erik Lie

Abstract

Consistent with the notion that dividends are very sticky, Daniel, Denis, and Naveen () report evidence that firms manage earnings upward when pre†managed earnings are expected to fall short of dividend payments. However, we find that this evidence is not robust when controlling for firms' tendency to manage earnings upward to avoid reporting earnings declines; only firms with high leverage exhibit a statistically weak tendency to manage earnings to close deficits of pre†managed earnings relative to dividends. We further report that the decision to cut dividends depends on whether reported earnings fall short of past dividends, but not on earnings management that eliminates a shortfall in pre†managed earnings relative to dividend payments. Overall, our evidence suggests that firms that face dividend constraints are more likely to cut dividends than to manage earnings to avoid dividend cuts.Conformément à la notion selon laquelle les dividendes sont très persistants, Daniel, Denis et Naveen (2008) font état de données indiquant que les sociétés gèrent le résultat à la hausse lorsqu'elles s'attendent à ce que le résultat, préalablement géré, soit inférieur aux versements de dividendes. Or, les auteurs constatent que ces données ne résistent pas au contrôle de la tendance des sociétés à gérer le résultat à la hausse pour éviter d'avoir à annoncer un fléchissement des bénéfices; seules les sociétés qui ont un levier financier élevé affichent une tendance statistiquement faible à gérer le résultat afin de combler le déficit entre le résultat préalablement géré et les dividendes. Les auteurs constatent en outre que la décision de réduire les dividendes dépend de l'existence d'un déficit du résultat publié par rapport aux dividendes passés, mais non du choix de gérer le résultat de manière à éliminer l'insuffisance du résultat préalablement géré par rapport aux versements de dividendes. Dans l'ensemble, les données recueillies par les auteurs permettent de croire que les sociétés qui sont aux prises avec des contraintes en matière de dividendes sont davantage susceptibles de réduire les dividendes que de gérer le résultat pour éviter les réductions de dividendes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaewoo Kim & Kyeong Hun Lee & Erik Lie, 2017. "Dividend Stickiness, Debt Covenants, and Earnings Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 2022-2050, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:34:y:2017:i:4:p:2022-2050
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ed-Dafali, Slimane & Patel, Ritesh & Iqbal, Najaf, 2023. "A bibliometric review of dividend policy literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Espahbodi, Reza & Liu, Nan & Weigand, Robert A., 2022. "Opportunistic earnings management or performance-related effects? Evidence from dividend-paying firms," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:34:y:2017:i:4:p:2022-2050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.