IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v47y2025i3p1095-1118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of geographical denomination on the uptake of fungus‐resistant grapes

Author

Listed:
  • Lucca Zachmann
  • Chloe McCallum
  • Robert Finger

Abstract

Grape production for wine making is of great economic and cultural importance in Europe, but is heavily dependent on pesticides. Reducing pesticide use and associated risks is a policy goal in several countries, particularly in Europe. The most effective strategy to substantially reduce pesticide use in grape production is the planting of fungus‐resistant varieties, which are less susceptible to common fungal infections and thus allow a massive reduction in pesticide treatments. However, their use remains low. One possible reason may be that planting new varieties may conflict with policies supporting geographical denomination systems, which tend to focus on traditional varieties. We provide the first study of how geographical denomination systems directly affect the adoption of fungus‐resistant varieties. Using a novel and uniquely detailed dataset of 54,483 variety‐level observations from 381 vineyards in Switzerland, we find that fungus‐resistant grape varieties are 2% more likely to be adopted by growers if they can be sold under geographical denominations. Thus, expanding the eligibility of fungus‐resistant varieties in geographical denomination lists could be a straightforward policy measure to stimulate their adoption. However, the effects are small, so complementary policies are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucca Zachmann & Chloe McCallum & Robert Finger, 2025. "The effect of geographical denomination on the uptake of fungus‐resistant grapes," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(3), pages 1095-1118, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:3:p:1095-1118
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.13512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:47:y:2025:i:3:p:1095-1118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.