IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v57y2013i1p218-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shades of Faith: Religious Foundations of Political Attitudes among African Americans, Latinos, and Whites

Author

Listed:
  • Brian D. McKenzie
  • Stella M. Rouse

Abstract

Although there is considerable evidence that religion influences political opinions, it is unclear how this story plays out across different segments of the U.S. population. Utilizing the 2000 Religion and Politics Survey, we examine the effects of religious beliefs, behaviors, and affiliations on citizens’ attitudes relating to issues of egalitarianism. Our study is one of the few to comparatively analyze the link between religious measures and political outlooks for the nation's three largest ethno‐racial groups. The findings show that conservative Christianity is consistently associated with less tolerant and less egalitarian views among whites. Religious African Americans and Latinos, however, hold more equitable opinions about disadvantaged individuals. To further strengthen our arguments, we also replicate these results using the 2008 American National Election Study. Overall, we demonstrate that a single perspective on religion and public opinion does not apply to all groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian D. McKenzie & Stella M. Rouse, 2013. "Shades of Faith: Religious Foundations of Political Attitudes among African Americans, Latinos, and Whites," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(1), pages 218-235, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:57:y:2013:i:1:p:218-235
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00611.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00611.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00611.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sascha O. Becker & Jared Rubin & Ludger Woessmann, 2023. "Religion and Growth," Monash Economics Working Papers 2023-15, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    2. Lisa Hoffmann & Matthias Basedau & Simone Gobien & Sebastian Prediger, 2020. "Universal Love or One True Religion? Experimental Evidence of the Ambivalent Effect of Religious Ideas on Altruism and Discrimination," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 603-620, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:57:y:2013:i:1:p:218-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.