IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wea/econth/v5y2016i1p19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Labour Theory of Property and Marginal Productivity Theory

Author

Listed:
  • David Ellerman

    (University of California at Riverside, USA, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

After Marx, dissenting economics almost always used 'the labour theory' as a theory of value. This paper develops a modern treatment of the alternative labour theory of property that is essentially the property theoretic application of the juridical principle of responsibility: impute legal responsibility in accordance with who was in fact responsible. To understand descriptively how assets and liabilities are appropriated in normal production, a 'fundamental myth' needs to be cleared away, and then the market mechanism of appropriation can be understood. On the normative side, neoclassical theory represents marginal productivity theory as showing that (a metaphorical version of) the imputation principle is satisfied ('people get what they produce') in competitive enterprises. Since that shows the moral commitment of neoclassical economics to the imputation principle, the labour theory of property is presented here as the actual non-metaphorical application of the imputation principle to property appropriation. The property-theoretic analysis at the firm level shows how the neoclassical (and much heterodox) analysis in terms of 'distributive shares' wholly misframed the basic questions. Finally, the paper shows how the imputation principle (modernised labour theory of property) is systematically violated in the present wage labour system of renting persons. The paper can be seen as taking up the recent challenge posed by Donald Katzner for a dialogue between neoclassical and heterodox microeconomics.

Suggested Citation

  • David Ellerman, 2016. "The Labour Theory of Property and Marginal Productivity Theory," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/the-labour-theory-of-property-and-marginal-productivity-theory/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/WEA-ET-5-1-Ellerman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ellerman, David, 2010. "Marxism as a capitalist tool," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 696-700, December.
    2. Donald W. Katzner, 2015. "A Neoclassical Curmudgeon Looks at Heterodox Criticisms of Microeconomics," World Economic Review, World Economics Association, vol. 2015(4), pages 1-63, February.
    3. David Ellerman, 2015. "On the Renting of Persons: The Neo-Abolitionist Case Against Today's Peculiar Institution," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, March.
    4. David Ellerman, 2014. "On Property Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 601-624.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Ellerman, 2016. "Reply to Commentaries on ‘The Labour Theory of Property and Marginal Productivity Theory’," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 5(2), pages 44-61, September.
    2. David Ellerman, 2017. "Comment on 'About Waged Labour: From Monetary Subordination to Exploitation'," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 6(2), pages 37-44, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Ellerman, 2016. "Reply to Commentaries on ‘The Labour Theory of Property and Marginal Productivity Theory’," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 5(2), pages 44-61, September.
    2. David Ellerman, 2015. "On the Renting of Persons: The Neo-Abolitionist Case Against Today's Peculiar Institution," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Schneider, Nathan, 2020. "Mediated Ownership: Capital as Media," MediArXiv np325, Center for Open Science.
    4. David Ellerman, 2014. "On a fallacy in the Kaldor–Hicks efficiency–equity analysis," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 125-136, June.
    5. Schneider, Nathan, 2020. "Mediated Ownership: Capital as Media," MediArXiv np325_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. David Ellerman, 2017. "Comment on 'About Waged Labour: From Monetary Subordination to Exploitation'," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 6(2), pages 37-44, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wea:econth:v:5:y:2016:i:1:p:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake McMurchie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/worecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.