IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/socchr/v8y2010i1p33-68n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Society in the 2004 Romanian Elections: Watchdog, Involved Arbiter or Political Actor?

Author

Listed:
  • Muntean Aurelian

    (National School of Political and Administrative Studies, Political Science Department, 6 Povernei, 71124 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Gheorghiţă Andrei

    (Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Department of Sociology and Social Work, 2-4 Lucian Blaga, 550169 Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

Civil society has proven outstanding capacities of involvement in the 2004 general elections in Romania and put a remarkable pressure on the political society. This paper aims to discuss the consequences of such involvement for both the political and civil society. We also investigate the conditions that have favoured a successful challenge of the main political actors by the most visible civic advocacy organizations. Further, we inquire how deep can an actor from the civil society go into the lands of the political society. In the end, we weight the achievements and the failures of civil society’s active involvement in the game of elections.

Suggested Citation

  • Muntean Aurelian & Gheorghiţă Andrei, 2010. "Civil Society in the 2004 Romanian Elections: Watchdog, Involved Arbiter or Political Actor?," Social Change Review, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 33-68, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:8:y:2010:i:1:p:33-68:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/scr-2016-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2016-0006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/scr-2016-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dryzek, John S., 1996. "Political Inclusion and the Dynamics of Democratization," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 90(3), pages 475-487, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans Pruijt, 2003. "Is the institutionalization of urban movements inevitable? A comparison of the opportunities for sustained squatting in New York City and Amsterdam," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 133-157, March.
    2. Ortwin Renn & Ilan Chabay & Sander van der Leeuw & Solène Droy, 2020. "Beyond the Indicators: Improving Science, Scholarship, Policy and Practice to Meet the Complex Challenges of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-6, January.
    3. Yael Yishai, 1998. "Civil Society in Transition: Interest Politics in Israel," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 555(1), pages 147-162, January.
    4. Karen Bickerstaff & Gordon Walker, 2005. "Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(12), pages 2123-2144, November.
    5. Paul Routledge, 2010. "Nineteen Days in April: Urban Protest and Democracy in Nepal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(6), pages 1279-1299, May.
    6. Michael Huspek, 2007. "Habermas and Oppositional Public Spheres: A Stereoscopic Analysis of Black and White Press Practices," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 821-843, December.
    7. Joshi, Devin K. & Hughes, Barry B. & Sisk, Timothy D., 2015. "Improving Governance for the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals: Scenario Forecasting the Next 50years," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 286-302.
    8. Brown, Judy, 2017. "Democratizing accounting: Reflections on the politics of “old” and “new” pluralisms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 20-46.
    9. Sofien Tiba & Mohamed Frikha, 2020. "Sustainability Challenge in the Agenda of African Countries: Evidence from Simultaneous Equations Models," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(3), pages 1270-1294, September.
    10. Anders Hayden & Jeffrey Wilson, 2016. "Is It What You Measure That Really Matters? The Struggle to Move beyond GDP in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Hugo Gorringe, 2016. "Dalit Parties and the Dilemmas of Democratization in Tamil Nadu," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 4(1), pages 49-62, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:8:y:2010:i:1:p:33-68:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.