IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/socchr/v15y2017i1-2p105-128n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Narrative Medicine – the methodology of doctor-patient communication analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Silistraru Ioana

    (University of Bucharest, Romania, Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, 9 Schitu Măgureanu Street, 050064 -Bucharest, Romania.)

Abstract

The present paper aims at presenting a non-exhaustive list of methodology instruments for narrative analysis in medical communication. Patient narratives became of more and more importance while evidence-based medicine has created a gap between patients, their illness and their doctors. While being investigated through high-technology instruments used in medicine, the patient vanishes behind the computer screen where his body is analysed based on the biomedical factors. Narrative medicine is defined by one of its founders as the interaction between a health practitioner who doesn’t simply look at diseases, but treats the person who’s suffering from an illness by listening closely to his story (Charon 2001). Therefore, as mentioned by Rita Charon in her works, the doctor-patient interactions are measured considering the effectiveness of medical care. The patient is empowered with medical knowledge related to his illness, transposed into an accessible language. On the other side of the communication spectrum, the doctor reconnects with his patient, manifesting interest on how the patient’s life is affected by illness, not only on how it can be effectively treated. ‘Now, in recent years medical narrative is changing—from the stories about patients and their illnesses, patient narratives and the unfolding and interwoven story between healthcare professionals and patients are both gaining momentum, leading to the creation or defining of narrative-based medicine (NBM).’ (Kalitzkus and Matthiessen 2009). Narrative based medicine is presented to counteract the pitfalls of evidence-based medicine (EBM). NBM can foster a better care while taking into account the patient’s story on the way illness is affecting the quality of his everyday life. The final objective of effective medical care is to alleviate, if not to dismiss completely the illness and the suffering of the patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Silistraru Ioana, 2017. "Narrative Medicine – the methodology of doctor-patient communication analysis," Social Change Review, Sciendo, vol. 15(1-2), pages 105-128, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:15:y:2017:i:1-2:p:105-128:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/scr-2017-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2017-0005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/scr-2017-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arora, Neeraj K., 2003. "Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(5), pages 791-806, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wonjeong Chae & Dong-Woo Choi & Eun-Cheol Park & Sung-In Jang, 2021. "Improved Inpatient Care through Greater Patient–Doctor Contact under the Hospitalist Management Approach: A Real-Time Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Fenton, Anny T. & Elliott, Marc N. & Schwebel, David C. & Berkowitz, Zahava & Liddon, Nicole C. & Tortolero, Susan R. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Davies, Suzy L. & Schuster, Mark A., 2018. "Unequal interactions: Examining the role of patient-centered care in reducing inequitable diffusion of a medical innovation, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 238-248.
    3. Tovey, P. & Broom, Alex, 2007. "Oncologists' and specialist cancer nurses' approaches to complementary and alternative medicine and their impact on patient action," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 2550-2564, June.
    4. Eggly, Susan & Penner, Louis A. & Greene, Meredith & Harper, Felicity W.K. & Ruckdeschel, John C. & Albrecht, Terrance L., 2006. "Information seeking during "bad news" oncology interactions: Question asking by patients and their companions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 2974-2985, December.
    5. Eduardo Pérez & David P. Dzubay, 2021. "A scheduling-based methodology for improving patient perceptions of quality of care in intensive care units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 203-215, March.
    6. Fatigante, Marilena & Heritage, John & Alby, Francesca & Zucchermaglio, Cristina, 2020. "Presenting treatment options in breast cancer consultations: Advice and consent in Italian medical care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    7. Kühlbrandt, Charlotte & Balabanova, Dina & Chikovani, Ivdity & Petrosyan, Varduhi & Kizilova, Kseniya & Ivaniuto, Oksana & Danii, Olga & Makarova, Noune & McKee, Martin, 2014. "In search of patient-centred care in middle income countries: The experience of diabetes care in the former Soviet Union," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 193-200.
    8. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "An Analysis of Knowledge Management for the Development of Global Health," MPRA Paper 82959, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Aug 2016.
    9. Budych, Karolina & Helms, Thomas M. & Schultz, Carsten, 2012. "How do patients with rare diseases experience the medical encounter? Exploring role behavior and its impact on patient–physician interaction," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 154-164.
    10. Speer, Susan A. & Tucker, Samantha R. & McPhillips, Rebecca & Peters, Sarah, 2017. "The clinical communication and information challenges associated with the psychosexual aspects of prostate cancer treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 17-26.
    11. Katherine Treiman & Lauren McCormack & Murrey Olmsted & Nancy Roach & Bryce B. Reeve & Christa E. Martens & Rebecca R. Moultrie & Hanna Sanoff, 2017. "Engaging Patient Advocates and Other Stakeholders to Design Measures of Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(1), pages 93-103, February.
    12. Adepeju M. Lateef & Euphemia M. Mhlongo, 2020. "Trends in Patient-Centered Care in South West Nigeria: A Holistic Assessment of the Nurses Perception of Primary Healthcare Practice," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 1-73, May.
    13. Epstein, Ronald M. & Franks, Peter & Fiscella, Kevin & Shields, Cleveland G. & Meldrum, Sean C. & Kravitz, Richard L. & Duberstein, Paul R., 2005. "Measuring patient-centered communication in Patient-Physician consultations: Theoretical and practical issues," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1516-1528, October.
    14. Carol Blixen & Adam T Perzynski & Ashley Bukach & Molly Howland & Martha Sajatovic, 2016. "Patients’ perceptions of barriers to self-managing bipolar disorder: A qualitative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(7), pages 635-644, November.
    15. Qing Huang & Jack Pun & Shuping Huang, 2022. "Using a Mixed-Methods Needs Analysis to Ensure the Sustainability and Success of English for Nursing Communication Courses: Improving Nurse-Patient Engagement Practices in Globalized Health Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Wade, Julia & Donovan, Jenny L. & Athene Lane, J. & Neal, David E. & Hamdy, Freddie C., 2009. "It's not just what you say, it's also how you say it: Opening the 'black box' of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2018-2028, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:15:y:2017:i:1-2:p:105-128:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.