IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v11y2019i1p1853-1861n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overview of construction simulation approaches to model construction processes

Author

Listed:
  • Bokor Orsolya

    (Northumbria University, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom;)

  • Florez Laura

    (Northumbria University,Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom)

  • Osborne Allan

    (Northumbria University,Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom)

  • Gledson Barry J.

    (Northumbria University,Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Construction simulation is a versatile technique with numerous applications. The basic simulation methods are discrete-event simulation (DES), agent-based modeling (ABM), and system dynamics (SD). Depending on the complexity of the problem, using a basic simulation method might not be enough to model construction works appropriately; hybrid approaches are needed. These are combinations of basic methods, or pairings with other techniques, such as fuzzy logic (FL) and neural networks (NNs). This paper presents a framework for applying simulation for problems within the field of construction. It describes DES, SD, and ABM, in addition to presenting how hybrid approaches are most useful in being able to reflect the dynamic nature of construction processes and capture complicated behavior, uncertainties, and dependencies. The examples show the application of the framework for masonry works and how it could be used for obtaining better productivity estimates. Several structures of hybrid simulation are presented alongside their inputs, outputs, and interaction points, which provide a practical reference for researchers on how to implement simulation to model construction systems of labor-intensive activities and lays the groundwork for applications in other construction-related activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Bokor Orsolya & Florez Laura & Osborne Allan & Gledson Barry J., 2019. "Overview of construction simulation approaches to model construction processes," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1853-1861, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:1853-1861:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2018-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/otmcj-2018-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Hong & Tam, C. M. & Li, Heng, 2005. "Modeling uncertain activity duration by fuzzy number and discrete-event simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 715-729, August.
    2. Michael J. Mawdesley, 2009. "Modelling construction project productivity using systems dynamics approach," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 59(1), pages 18-36, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sobel, Matthew J. & Szmerekovsky, Joseph G. & Tilson, Vera, 2009. "Scheduling projects with stochastic activity duration to maximize expected net present value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 697-705, November.
    2. V. Sireesha & N. Ravi Shankar, 2013. "A new approach to find project characteristics and multiple possible critical paths in a fuzzy project network," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 69-85, March.
    3. Zhang, Jingwen & Elmaghraby, Salah E., 2014. "The relevance of the “alphorn of uncertainty” to the financial management of projects under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 65-76.
    4. Hainan Guo & David Goldsman & Kwok-Leung Tsui & Yu Zhou & Shui-Yee Wong, 2016. "Using simulation and optimisation to characterise durations of emergency department service times with incomplete data," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6494-6511, November.
    5. Wenshuai Song & Tao Guan & Bingyu Ren & Jia Yu & Jiajun Wang & Binping Wu, 2020. "Real-Time Construction Simulation Coupling a Concrete Temperature Field Interval Prediction Model with Optimized Hybrid-Kernel RVM for Arch Dams," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Yong-Hong Kuo & Omar Rado & Benedetta Lupia & Janny M. Y. Leung & Colin A. Graham, 2016. "Improving the efficiency of a hospital emergency department: a simulation study with indirectly imputed service-time distributions," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 120-147, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:1853-1861:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.