IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v9y2016i1p191-222n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative Aspects of Alternative Consumer Dispute Resolution in the European Union (EU), Slovenia and Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Jeretina Urša

    (Urša Jeretina finished her Bachelor degree at the Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, University of Maribor, and has just obtained her Master degree in Public administrative science at the Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. After a successfully finished student internship within the Erasmus exchange program at the Croatian Mediation Association – CMA in Zagreb (Croatia) –, she had also efficiently finished a professional traineeship there. She is a mediator, mediation and administrative consultant and Head of Research and Development at Zavod UP – Institution for administrative operations in Ljubljana, Slovenia. She is now a PhD student in the PhD doctoral communication science study program at the Faculty of social sciences, University of Vienna, Austria.)

Abstract

The consumer field is widespread and often encompasses different legal fields on a single market, especially when it comes to the field of consumer protection. In fact, the consumer mostly remains a weaker party in resolving consumer disputes, especially in administrative proceedings. Traditional court proceedings do not always offer the most cost-appropriate way of resolving consumer disputes, because the damage with legal costs is disproportionate, especially in Small Claims (20 EUR). In theory, Alternative Dispute Resolution (hereinafter: ADR) is considered more flexible, faster and cheaper for disputes between consumers and businesses. Insofar, Consumer ADR (hereinafter: CADR) is seen as a useful tool that helps consumers realize their right of access to justice. It is argued that CADR systems provide valuable information on the needs of disputants, while preserving confidentiality, increasing consumer satisfaction, equality and grater trust. While CADR is praised in theory as an added value, in practice it still remains unrecognizable and therefore is seen as an ineffective formalism in some EU countries. It seems that consumers and businesses lack awareness of the CADR schemes and their benefits, which have effects on the efficient use of CADR in different public and private institutions. The focus of this paper is on the field of Public Administrative Law, which, through different approaches of scientific analysis, combines the main administrative aspects of CADR systems in the EU. Special attention is given to different administrative barriers in the development of various CADR schemes, which cause the formation of administrative dilemmas in some Member states. The new EU legal regulation on Consumer ADR, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) and EU Administrative law have set flexible rules and principles that would assure the quality of dispute resolution between EU entities with private or public interests. Similarities in proposed principles would lead us closer towards a common European Administrative Space. However, so far such EU initiatives have left many questions unanswered regarding the supervision and financing of CADR schemes, as well as the administrative issues about the purely internal harmonization of “administrative” CADR practices in Member States. An example of the substantial administrative dilemmas in CADR practices, mostly in the field of universal services, can be recognized in existing CADR systems in selected EU countries, e.g. Slovenia and Croatia.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeretina Urša, 2016. "Administrative Aspects of Alternative Consumer Dispute Resolution in the European Union (EU), Slovenia and Croatia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 191-222, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:191-222:n:9
    DOI: 10.1515/nispa-2016-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/nispa-2016-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandra Ema Cioclea, 2012. "Principles Of The European Administrative Space And Their Impact On Performance In Public Organizations," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4(3), pages 288-295, September.
    2. repec:jes:wpaper:y:2012:v:4:p:287-295 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Oecd, 1999. "European Principles for Public Administration," SIGMA Papers 27, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero & Gonzalo Fernández-Valero & Miguel Blanco-Callejo, 2017. "Supplier Qualification Sub-Process from a Sustained Perspective: Generation of Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling & Will Lowe & Christian van Stolk, 2016. "Silent professionalization: EU integration and the professional socialization of public officials in Central and Eastern Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(1), pages 162-183, March.
    3. Eva Ardielli, 2016. "Public Administration Transparency in E-government at Local Level of Czech Government," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 2(8), pages 24-33, July.
    4. Cristea, Ana Ionela, 2014. "El Espacio Administrativo Europeo en el contexto de la europeización [The European Administrative Space in the context of europeanization]," MPRA Paper 56309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Karayalcin, Cem, 2016. "Property rights and the first great divergence: Europe 1500–1800," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 484-498.
    6. Eva G. Heidbreder, 2009. "Structuring the European Administrative Space - Channels of EU Penetration and Mechanisms ofNational Change," KFG Working Papers p0005, Free University Berlin.
    7. Ani Matei & Lucica Matei & Diana-Camelia Iancu, 2011. "Socio-Statistical Research on the Internalization of European Administrative Space Principles in the Romanian Public Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Andrew J. Taylor, 2013. "The European Union and State Building in the Western Balkans," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 183-195.
    9. Fatos Salliu, 2015. "What is the Stage of Development of Albania in the Information Society?," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, May - Aug.
    10. Gordana Zurga, 2011. "Public administration’s added value to the competitiveness of national economy," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 29(1), pages 193-223.
    11. Sičáková-Beblavá Emília & Kollárik Martin & Sloboda Matúš, 2016. "Exploring the Determinants of Transparency of Slovak Municipalities," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 121-145, December.
    12. Quaresima, Federico, 2019. "Patronage Appointments between Politics and Public Governance: a Review," MPRA Paper 94650, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. David E. Winickoff & Kendra Klein, 2011. "Food Labels and the Environment: Towards Harmonization of EU and US Organic Standards," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Eva Ardielli, 2016. "Public Administration Transparency in E-government at Local Level of Czech Government," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 2(8), pages 24-33, July.
    15. Matei, Ani, 2004. "The Development of the European Administration. Fundamental Concepts and Approaches," MPRA Paper 19765, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Dec 2008.
    16. Matei, Lucica & Iancu, Diana Camelia, 2009. "On the Way to Modernization: The 'Good Enough' Governance Making in Romania," MPRA Paper 18941, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 May 2009.
    17. Andrei, Tudorel & Profiroiu, Marius & Oancea, Bogdan & TurtureaN, Marius & Matei, Ani, 2010. "Analiza unor aspecte legate de mobilitatea si politizarea functiei publice in administratia publica din Romania," MPRA Paper 25957, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Sep 2010.
    18. Panagiota Xanthopoulou & Iosif Plimakis, 2021. "From New Public Management to Public Sector Management Reforms during the pandemic. The effects of Covid-19 on public management reforms and effectiveness," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 576-596, Decembrie.
    19. Kovač Polonca, 2017. "Innovative Administrative Procedure Law: Mission Impossible ?," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 93-117, December.
    20. William Dunn & David Miller, 2007. "A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 345-358, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:191-222:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.