IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecothe/v62y2024i4p521-540n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Private Higher Education Institutions Based on Topsis Method

Author

Listed:
  • Đuričić Biljana

    (Western Serbia Academy of Applied Studies Užice, Republic of Serbia)

  • Medved Ivana

    (University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economics in Subotica, Republic of Serbia)

Abstract

The national economy of each country and its long-term development depend on the quality of the human resources. The higher education sector is one of the most important factors in building a high-quality workforce. It is exactly because of the importance of higher education institutions that countries used to have a key role in their financing, regulation and supervision. However, the commercialisation of the higher education sector has led to the abolition of the monopoly held by public higher education institutions, i.e. to the opening of private institutions. Recently, the ranking of higher education institutions has been gaining importance. This study used the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to rank order the private higher education institutions in the Republic of Serbia in 2021. The study was carried out using 16 criteria, mostly accounting ones, to rank the private institutions. It involved 10 private universities, together with their member faculties, 10 private colleges of academic studies, and 16 colleges of applied studies. The obtained ranking results are beneficial to the institutions in terms of their business improvement aimed at staying ahead of the competition, and meeting the stakeholder needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Đuričić Biljana & Medved Ivana, 2024. "Ranking Private Higher Education Institutions Based on Topsis Method," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 62(4), pages 521-540.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:62:y:2024:i:4:p:521-540:n:1006
    DOI: 10.2478/ethemes-2024-0028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2024-0028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ethemes-2024-0028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    private higher education institutions; ranking; TOPSIS method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • A20 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:62:y:2024:i:4:p:521-540:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.