IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v22y2025i1p97-107n1008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of the State in Providing Minimum Welfare Through Universal Basic Income and Social Security Mechanisms

Author

Listed:
  • Neverauskienė Laima Okunevičiūte

    (Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania; Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Webster Emilija

    (Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Andriušaitienė Daiva

    (Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Research purpose. Universal Basic Income (UBI) is a noteworthy social and economic model that reduces absolute poverty, improves people's physical and mental well-being, and has a positive impact on the labour market. It could serve as an alternative to the increasing need to adjust, reform, and enhance current social protection systems to ensure at least minimal welfare guarantees through them. The aim of this article is to evaluate whether the state's efforts to ensure minimum welfare and the expectations of the Lithuanian population regarding the state's role in securing socio-economic stability can be regarded as prerequisites for the introduction of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) as an alternative to the existing social security system. Design / Methodology / Approach. The article is structured around the following research methodology: scientific literature on UBI as an alternative measure to the social security system, correlational and regression analysis, quantitative research, summary of research findings, and conclusions. Findings. European countries strive to ensure at least a minimum level of well-being for their citizens. When looking for solutions to do this, there are two possible alternatives - to improve the social security system or to introduce UBI. This means making a radical decision on the method of ensuring minimum well-being. In both cases, it is necessary to consider state spending. Currently, the state's contribution to ensuring well-being includes not only government spending on monetary social support for people with the lowest incomes but also for those receiving the minimum and average wages. The expectations of Lithuanian residents regarding the provision of minimum well-being are thus focused on the state. Originality / Value / Practical implications. The results of the study presented in the article suggest the need to intensify the debate on the introduction of UBI in Lithuania to reduce poverty in the most economically disadvantaged households. Two main alternatives exist: improving the current social protection systems (which is a more costly option in terms of cost-effectiveness due to inefficient administrative expenses) or introducing Universal Basic Income (UBI), which is a relatively cheaper option from an administrative standpoint. While the second alternative is not without its drawbacks, it is certainly worthy of at least theoretical discussion regarding the feasibility and potential of a phased introduction of UBI across the entire EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Neverauskienė Laima Okunevičiūte & Webster Emilija & Andriušaitienė Daiva, 2025. "The Role of the State in Providing Minimum Welfare Through Universal Basic Income and Social Security Mechanisms," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 97-107.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:97-107:n:1008
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2025-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2025-0008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2025-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Widerquist Karl, 2024. "Functional Finance and the Sustainability of Universal Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 15-29, June.
    2. Jouko Verho & Kari Hämäläinen & Ohto Kanninen, 2022. "Removing Welfare Traps: Employment Responses in the Finnish Basic Income Experiment," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 501-522, February.
    3. Hochman Rachael & Larkin Charles & Corbet Shaen, 2024. "A Survey of Universal Basic Income Experiments," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 201-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jouko Verho & Kari Hämäläinen & Ohto Kanninen, 2022. "Removing Welfare Traps: Employment Responses in the Finnish Basic Income Experiment," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 501-522, February.
    2. Olli Kangas & Minna Ylikännö, 2023. "Basic Income and the Status of Women in an Established Gender-Equal Welfare State: Results from the Finnish Basic Income Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    3. David Westlake & Sally Holland & Michael Sanders & Elizabeth Schroeder & Kate E Pickett & Matthew Johnson & Stavros Petrou & Rod Hick & Louise Roberts & Guillermo Rodriguez-Guzman & Dimitris Vallis & , 2024. "The basic income for care leavers in Wales pilot evaluation: Protocol of a quasi-experimental evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Melline A. Somers & Ruud J. A. Muffels & Annemarie Kuenn-Nelen, 2025. "(Un)conditional Basic Income and Participation Income: A Review of Its Micro- and Macro-Economic Effects," De Economist, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 205-244, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H59 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:22:y:2025:i:1:p:97-107:n:1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.