IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v64y2017i4p493-512id401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Performance of the Construction Sectors in the Baltic States and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Valentinas Podvezko
  • Simona Kildienė
  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

Abstract

The paper describes the evaluation of the construction market performance in three Baltic states, including Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland, based on using structural statistical criteria. The evaluation covers various periods of time, embracing the time before the economic crisis, in 2007, during the economic crisis, in 2009, and after the economic crisis, in 2013. For assessing the efficiency of their construction sectors’ performance, the investigated countries are arranged in the order of preference according to this indicator by using three multiple-criteria decision making methods (MCDM), such as SAW, TOPSIS and COPRAS. These evaluation methods are based on determining the weights of the structural criteria used. For this purpose, three various methods, including the entropy, the method of the criteria impact loss (CILOS) and a new method of determining the objective criteria weights (IDOCRIW) suggested by the authors. The results obtained allowed the researchers to assess the construction market performance in the considered states in various periods of time, to compare them with other countries and to rank them based on this parameter. Therefore, the suggested method of market performance evaluation may be used as an effective supplementary aid for determining the priorities in the future business development, as well as for studying the competitive markets or directing the cash flows of an enterprise to the appropriate areas. Key words: Construction sector, Market indicators, Assessing MCDM, Entropy method, CILOS method, IDOCRIW method.JEL: C44, C51, N60. U radu je opisana procena učinka građevinskog tržišta u tri baltičke države, uključujući Estoniju, Latviju, Litvaniju i Poljsku, na osnovu korišćenja strukturnih statističkih kriterijuma. Procena pokriva različite vremenske periode, koji obuhvata vreme pre ekonomske krize, u 2007. godini, tokom ekonomske krize, u 2009. godini, i nakon ekonomske krize, u 2013 godini. Za procenu efikasnosti učinka građevinskog sektora, zemlje od interesa su poređane prema redosledu preferencije prema ovom indikatoru korišćenjem tri višekriterijumske metode donošenja odluka (MCDM), kao što su SAW, TOPSIS i COPRAS. Ove metode procene se zasnivaju na određivanju težine korišćenih strukturnih kriterijuma. U tu svrhu, tri različite metode, uključujući metod entropije, metod kriterijuma uticaja gubitka (CILOS) i novi metod određivanja težine ciljnih kriterijuma (IDOCRIV) su predloženi od strane autora. Dobijeni rezultati su omogućili istraživačima da u različitim vremenskim intervalima procenjuju performanse građevinskog tržišta u razmatranim državama, da ih uporede sa drugim zemljama i da ih rangiraju na osnovu ovog parametra. Zbog toga, predloženi metod vrednovanja tržišnog učinka može se koristiti kao delotvorna dopunska metoda za određivanje prioriteta u budućem razvoju poslovanja, kao i za proučavanje konkurentnih tržišta ili usmeravanje gotovinskih tokova preduzeća u odgovarajuće oblasti. Ključne reči: Građevinski sektor, tržišni indikatori, procena MCDM, metod entropije, CILOS metoda, IDOCRIW metoda.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentinas Podvezko & Simona Kildienė & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2017. "Assessing the Performance of the Construction Sectors in the Baltic States and Poland," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 64(4), pages 493-512.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:64:y:2017:i:4:p:493-512:id:401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/401/383
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    construction sector; market indicators; assessing MCDM; CILOS method; IDOCRIW method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • N60 - Economic History - - Manufacturing and Construction - - - General, International, or Comparative

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:64:y:2017:i:4:p:493-512:id:401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.