IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v54y1978i1p64-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning

Author

Listed:
  • William A. Fischel

Abstract

Planners have been introducing a greater degree of discretion into land use decisions through the use of flexible zoning techniques as a means of improving the traditional system of land use regulation. But this has been a cause for concern and planners ...

Suggested Citation

  • William A. Fischel, 1978. "A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 54(1), pages 64-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:54:y:1978:i:1:p:64-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3146203
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Cinyabuguma & Virginia McConnell, 2013. "Urban Growth Externalities And Neighborhood Incentives: Another Cause Of Urban Sprawl?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 332-348, May.
    2. McConnell, Virginia & Walls, Margaret & Kopits, Elizabeth, 2006. "Zoning, TDRs and the density of development," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 440-457, May.
    3. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.
    4. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
    5. Chris Webster, 2003. "The Donald Robertson Memorial Prizewinner 2003 The Nature of the Neighbourhood," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(13), pages 2591-2612, December.
    6. Helsley, Robert W. & Strange, William C., 1995. "Strategic growth controls," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 435-460, August.
    7. William Fischel, 1980. "Externalities and zoning," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 37-43, January.
    8. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Wu, JunJie, 2001. "Measuring Interactions Among Urban Development, Land Use Regulations, And Public Finance," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20774, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Chris Webster & Fulong Wu, 2001. "Coase, Spatial Pricing and Self -organising Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(11), pages 2037-2054, October.
    10. J. Peter Clinch & Eoin O'Neill, 2010. "Assessing the Relative Merits of Development Charges and Transferable Development Rights in an Uncertain World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 891-911, April.
    11. Glaeser, Edward L. & Ward, Bryce A., 2009. "The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 265-278, May.
    12. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Lawrence W C Lai & Marco K W Yu, 2001. "The Rise and Fall of Discriminatory Zoning in Hong Kongt," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 28(2), pages 295-314, April.
    14. Erwin van der Krabben, 2009. "A Property Rights Approach to Externality Problems: Planning Based on Compensation Rules," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(13), pages 2869-2890, December.
    15. Sakashita, Noboru, 1995. "An economic theory of urban growth control," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 427-434, August.
    16. Christopher J. Webster, 1998. "Public Choice, Pigouvian and Coasian Planning Theory," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(1), pages 53-75, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:54:y:1978:i:1:p:64-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.