IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v60y2025i5p1706-1736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female Executives and the Motherhood Penalty

Author

Listed:
  • Seth Murray
  • Danielle H. Sandler
  • Matthew Staiger

Abstract

We use U.S. linked survey and administrative data to investigate whether the sex composition of a firm’s executives affects the earnings of new mothers. Our empirical strategy compares the earnings trajectories of new mothers to observably similar coworkers who did not give birth around that time. On average, mothers earn almost $2,000 less per quarter two years after birth, but the magnitude of these losses is unrelated to the female share of executives at the mothers’ employer. Our results suggest that increasing the representation of women in firms’ leadership positions will not reduce the motherhood penalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth Murray & Danielle H. Sandler & Matthew Staiger, 2025. "Female Executives and the Motherhood Penalty," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 60(5), pages 1706-1736.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:60:y:2025:i:5:p:1706-1736
    Note: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0521-11673R1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jhr.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/60/5/1706
    Download Restriction: A subscription is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • M50 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:60:y:2025:i:5:p:1706-1736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.