IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpemac/doi10.1086-741479.html

Selection, Absolute Advantage, and the Agricultural Productivity Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Alvarez-Cuadrado
  • Francesco Amodio
  • Markus Poschke

Abstract

Output per worker is lower in agriculture than in other sectors, especially in poor countries. Worker sorting can explain this fact if comparative and absolute advantage in agriculture are positively correlated. We examine this correlation using representative household-level panel data from four African countries. Approximately one-third of households engage in both agriculture and nonfarm entrepreneurship, providing a unique lens to study sorting patterns. We find that more productive farming households are more likely to pursue entrepreneurship, allocate more time to it, and increasingly transition into it over time. These findings suggest that agricultural comparative and absolute advantage are negatively correlated.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Alvarez-Cuadrado & Francesco Amodio & Markus Poschke, 2026. "Selection, Absolute Advantage, and the Agricultural Productivity Gap," Journal of Political Economy Macroeconomics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(3), pages 513-562.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemac:doi:10.1086/741479
    DOI: 10.1086/741479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741479
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/741479
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/741479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpemac:doi:10.1086/741479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPEMA .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.