IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jnlbus/v74y2001i4p557-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cyclical Demand and the Choice of Debt Maturity

Author

Listed:
  • Emery, Gary W

Abstract

This study provides a model in which a supplier's use of short- and long-term debt depends on the demand for its product. The model predicts that suppliers use short-term debt to match their assets' and liabilities' maturities and that their incentive to do so is stronger, the larger the term premium. The model also predicts that the use of short-term debt increases the amplitudes of the supplier's investment, production, and sales cycles. These changes occur because the use of short-term debt permits suppliers to match production and sales more closely to the pattern of demand for the final good. Copyright 2001 by University of Chicago Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Emery, Gary W, 2001. "Cyclical Demand and the Choice of Debt Maturity," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(4), pages 557-590, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:74:y:2001:i:4:p:557-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-9398%28200110%2974%3A4%3C557%3ACDATCO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Z&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang Nam & Doina Radulescu, 2010. "Effects of corporate tax reform on optimum debt maturity," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 369-389, July.
    2. Andreas Stephan & Oleksandr Talavera & Andriy Tsapin, 2008. "Corporate Debt Maturity Choice in Transition Financial Markets," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 784, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Chen, Lirong & Gao, Feiyang & Guo, Tongtong & Huang, Xuanhao, 2023. "Mixed ownership reform and the short-term debt for long-term investment of non-state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Stephan, Andreas & Talavera, Oleksandr & Tsapin, Andriy, 2011. "Corporate debt maturity choice in emerging financial markets," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 141-151, May.
    5. Takaoka, Sumiko & Takahashi, Koji, 2018. "Differential effects of unconventional monetary policy on syndicated loan contracts," MPRA Paper 89342, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Manak Gupta & Alice Lee, 2006. "An Integrated Model of Debt Issuance, Refunding, and Maturity," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 177-199, March.
    7. Dai, Ya & Guo, Liang & Zhang, Hongxian & Liu, Yu, 2020. "On-balance-sheet duration hedging and firm value," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Takaoka, Sumiko & Takahashi, Koji, 2022. "Corporate debt and unconventional monetary policy: The risk-taking channel with bond and loan contracts," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Segarra Blasco, Agustí, 1958- & Teruel, Mercedes, 2010. "Are small firms more sensitive to financial variables?," Working Papers 2072/151623, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    10. Lai, Van Son & Soumaré, Issouf, 2010. "Credit insurance and investment: A contingent claims analysis approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 98-107, March.
    11. Chang Woon Nam & Doina Radulescu & Doina Maria Radulescu, 2004. "Does Debt Maturity Matter for Investment Decisions?," CESifo Working Paper Series 1124, CESifo.
    12. Pedro J. García‐Teruel & Pedro Martínez‐Solano & Juan P. Sánchez‐Ballesta, 2010. "Accruals Quality and Debt Maturity Structure," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(2), pages 188-210, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:74:y:2001:i:4:p:557-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.jstor.org/journal/jbusiness .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.