Spin-Offs, Ex Ante
Cusatis, Miles, and Woolridge (1993) report large positive excess returns following spin-offs over the period 1965-88. We investigate whether a trading strategy based on this ex post analysis would have earned excess returns on an ex ante basis over the period 1989-95. When compared with the matched firm benchmark used by Cusatis et al. and the Fama and French (1993) 3-factor model, the strategy does not beat the benchmark. When compared with size- and book-to-market-matched portfolios, the strategy typically beats the benchmark. On an ex ante basis, post-spin-off returns provide a shaky basis for rejecting the efficient market hypothesis. Copyright 2001 by University of Chicago Press.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.