An Efficiency Analysis of the Line Drawing in the Tax Law
The tax law frequently distinguishes or draws lines between economically similar activities. For example, the tax law draws lines between selling and holding, debt and equity, corporations and partnerships, and independent contractors and employees. Policy makers typically have discretion to shift the boundaries between these categories but cannot eliminate the categories or make the treatments of the categories consistent. Where a given line is drawn will have efficiency effects. This paper provides a model of efficient line drawing and gives several applications. The model shows that, generally, lines should be drawn so that a transaction or item is taxed like its closest substitutes. Moreover, the benefit of keeping substitutes together often outweighs the negative effect of raising an inefficient tax. For example, if a new financial instrument is a better substitute for equity than for debt, it should be classified as equity notwithstanding the resulting increase in the inefficient corporate tax. Copyright 2000 by the University of Chicago.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:29:y:2000:i:1:p:71-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.