Job Matching and On-the-Job Training
Conventional analysis predicts that workers pay part of their on-the-job training costs by accepting a lower starting wage and subsequently realize a return to this investment in the form of greater wage growth. Missing from the conventional treatment of on-the-job training is a discussion of the process by which heterogeneous worker s are matched to jobs requiring varying amounts of training. This matching process constitutes a key feature of the on-the-job training model that is presented in this article and tested with a unique dat a set containing extensive information concerning on-the-job training, employer search, wages, and wage and productivity growth. Copyright 1989 by University of Chicago Press.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlabec:v:7:y:1989:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.