IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v18y2023i2p232-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pencils Down? Computerized Testing and Student Achievement

Author

Listed:
  • John Gordanier

    (Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208)

  • Orgul Ozturk

    (Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208)

  • Crystal Zhan

    (Department of Economics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208)

Abstract

Computer-based testing (CBT) is becoming an increasingly popular format of assessment in educational settings. If students face a digital divide in terms of access to computers at school and at home, CBT may exacerbate measured student achievement gaps. In this paper, we use the rollout of CBT in South Carolina starting in 2015 to investigate its effect on measured student performance. We link student-level test scores and poverty measures to the share of students taking CBT in a grade of a school and show that CBT has a significant negative impact on test scores of multiple subjects. The negative impact is not uniform across student subgroups but rather particularly large for students in poor households. There is little evidence that the effect fades as students and schools become more experienced with computerized testing. These results suggest that the testing mode change might have distributional consequences. However, we do find a smaller effect in schools where technology is more readily available, implying that school-level investments could mitigate the effect.

Suggested Citation

  • John Gordanier & Orgul Ozturk & Crystal Zhan, 2023. "Pencils Down? Computerized Testing and Student Achievement," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 18(2), pages 232-252, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:18:y:2023:i:2:p:232-252
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00373
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:18:y:2023:i:2:p:232-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.