IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/teg/journl/v21y2025i2p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Top Researchers May Suppress More Information Than They Provide: Surveying NBER Dismissive Literature Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Richard P Phelps, Cathryn MacArthur

Abstract

The authors read a systematic sample of "working papers" downloaded from the website of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) from the past quarter century—the years 2000 to 2024. They looked for "dismissive literature reviews" in the introductory and concluding sections of the papers. A dismissive review is one declaring an absence of previous research, or previous research worth referencing, for example: "there is no previous research on," "this is the first study of," and "surprisingly, few studies have broached this topic." Typically, dismissive reviews are raw declarations, made without mention or evidence of having conducted a literature search. All working papers retrieved for the topic "education" are classified into three groups(lacking a true education focus, containing no dismissive reviews, containing one or more). The authors provide summary descriptive statistics for various quantities by category and a 1000 plus line list of all the working papers retrieved and the dismissive reviews we found, which are highlighted within verbatim text. Dismissive reviews' character and variety are discussed along with their implications for public policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard P Phelps, Cathryn MacArthur, 2025. "Top Researchers May Suppress More Information Than They Provide: Surveying NBER Dismissive Literature Reviews," Nonpartisan Education Review, Nonpartisan Education Review, vol. 21(2), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v21n2.html
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Articles/v21n2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard P. Phelps (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nonpartisaneducation.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.