IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/teg/journl/v14y2018i4p1-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Illusion of Rigor

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Stamm

Abstract

This essay begins with a brief summary of the IEA comparisons of mathematics achievement from 1964 to 2007, showing the predominance of Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, and Singapore. Then in response to one scholar�s suggestion that their success stems from the fact that their curricula are challenging, demanding and rigorous, I provide evidence that in the case of Japan, the exact opposite is true, and that the real key is that Japanese elementary teachers use extremely effective teaching methods which they have developed over decades of classroom research. They also understand that their students, who are taught in mixed ability classrooms, need to move at a moderate pace and have frequent periods of vigorous activity. This results in a high level of learning compared to that of students in other systems, which leads to the mistaken assumption that their curriculum is more difficult. An appendix is provided with excerpts of lessons from two different publishers, separated by seven years, illustrating the efficiency and consistency of their teaching practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Stamm, 2018. "The Illusion of Rigor," Nonpartisan Education Review, Nonpartisan Education Review, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:1-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v14n4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://nonpartisaneducation.org/Review/Essays/v14n4.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; policy;

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:teg:journl:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:1-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard P. Phelps (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nonpartisaneducation.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.