IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v9y2020i1p254-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Position of witness in the judge power system in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Yudo Adiananto

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

  • Abdul Rachmad Budiono

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

  • Tunggul Anshari SN

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

  • Iwan Permadi

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

Abstract

The prosecutor's position as a government agency that carries out state power in the field of prosecution has resulted in its own legal problems. The Attorney General's Office, on the one hand, is part of a government agency (executive) and is carrying out a prosecution (judicial) function. There is a conflict of norms in the regulation between Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 30 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia with Article 38 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) letter b of Law No. 48 of 209 concerning Judicial Power. The Prosecutor's Office in carrying out its authority independently and independently in the field of prosecution is difficult to be separated from the influence of the power of the authorities, because the Prosecutor's position is under the executive power.

Suggested Citation

  • Yudo Adiananto & Abdul Rachmad Budiono & Tunggul Anshari SN & Iwan Permadi, 2020. "Position of witness in the judge power system in Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 254-258, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:254-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/download/1046/364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/1046/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Prosecutor's Office; Prosecution; Executive; Judiciary;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:1:p:254-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.