IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v7y2020i1p107-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rhetorical Devices in Political Speeches: Nigel Farage's Speeches at the European Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Sokarno Abdel-Hafiz Hussein

    (Aswan University of Egypt)

Abstract

Nigel Farage's speeches and rhetoric have been instrumental and effective in the British voters' decision to withdraw from the European Union. This paper aims to study rhetorical devices in the speeches of Nigel Farage at the European Parliament: list constructions, contrastive pairs etc. Having identified and classified the rhetorical devices, I proceed to perform a frequency analysis with the purpose of determining the number of times each device occurs. Thus the research questions are: (a) what rhetorical devices permeate the speeches? and (b) what is their frequency of occurrence? In order to achieve these objectives, I have studied twenty speeches Farage delivered at the European Parliament during the period from 2010 to 2017. I examine rhetorical devices that were previously treated as nonessential in Farage's speeches (cf. Hadicke 2012) and I present arguments against the claim that the three-part list is the most common strategy in political speeches.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Sokarno Abdel-Hafiz Hussein, 2020. "Rhetorical Devices in Political Speeches: Nigel Farage's Speeches at the European Parliament," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 7(1), pages 107-121, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:107-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/download/190/153
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    rhetorical devices; political speech; list constructions; contrastive pairs; metaphors;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:7:y:2020:i:1:p:107-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.