IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v27y2022i1p70-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Teachers of SMK Negeri 6 Malang (Case Study of Electrical Power Installation Engineering and Autotronic Engineering)

Author

Listed:
  • Dodik Septian Ferdiansyah

    (State University of Malang)

  • Syaad Patmanthara

    (State University of Malang)

  • Hary Suswanto

    (State University of Malang)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) proficiency. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The instruments used to measure TPACK are in the form of questionnaires and interview questionnaires using a Likert scale with 5 scales. The samples of this study were Electrical Power Installation Engineering (EPIE) teachers at SMK N 6 Malang, totaling 7 people and Autotronic Engineering (AE) teachers at SMK N 6 Malang totaling 6 people. The results of the study are EPIE teachers' TK skills are in very good criteria with an average of 68, while AE teachers' kindergarten skills are in good criteria with an average of 53. EPIE teachers' PK skills are in good criteria with average - an average of 67.3, while the PK skills of AE teachers are in good criteria with an average of 75.2. EPIE teachers' CK skills are in very good criteria with an average of 31, while the CK skills of AE teachers are in very good criteria good with an average of 31. EPIE teachers' TCK skills are in very good criteria with an average of 26, while AE teachers' TCK skills are in good criteria with an average of 22. EPIE teachers' PCK skills are at criteria very good with an average of 57, while the PCK skills of AE teachers are in very good criteria with an average of 56. EPIE teachers' TPK skills are in good criteria with an average of 26.6, while the TPK skills of AE teachers are at good criteria with an average of 26.8. EPIE teachers' TPACK skills are in good criteria with an average of 18.4, while AE teachers' TPACK skills are in good criteria with an average of 18.2.

Suggested Citation

  • Dodik Septian Ferdiansyah & Syaad Patmanthara & Hary Suswanto, 2022. "Evaluation of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Teachers of SMK Negeri 6 Malang (Case Study of Electrical Power Installation Engineering and Autotronic Engineering)," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 27(1), pages 70-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:27:y:2022:i:1:p:70-82
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v27i1.5513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/5513/1931
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/5513
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v27i1.5513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nurlaila Hayati & Asep Kadarohman & Wahyu Sopandi & Muhamad Abdulkadir Martoprawiro & Diana Rochintaniawati, 2022. "Chemistry Teachers' TPACK Competence: Teacher Perception and Lesson Plan Analysis," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 237-247, August.
    2. repec:thr:techub:10034:y:2022:i:1:p:237-247 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK); Teacher; Vocational High School;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:27:y:2022:i:1:p:70-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.