IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v24y2021i1p291-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State administrative assets report as sufficient preliminary evidence in the crime of corruption

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Chusniah

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

  • Sudarsono

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

  • I Nyoman Nurjaya

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

  • Abdul Madjid

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas Brawijaya)

Abstract

The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The State Organizing Assets Report as an administrative document can be used as a legal document as sufficient initial evidence in a criminal act of corruption.Sufficient preliminary evidence is interpreted as a minimum of 2 (two) pieces of evidence as stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions and statements of the defendant. The State Organizing Assets Report is an extension of documentary evidence considering that the State Organizing Assets Report is made according to the provisions of the law, is required to be reported to the Corruption Eradication Commission and those who don't comply are subject to sanctions and are intended to prove a thing or condition so that it meets the criteria for the instrument documentary evidence as referred to in Article 187 letter d of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Chusniah & Sudarsono & I Nyoman Nurjaya & Abdul Madjid, 2021. "State administrative assets report as sufficient preliminary evidence in the crime of corruption," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 24(1), pages 291-295, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:291-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4768/1669
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4768
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    evidence; corruption;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:291-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.