IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v23y2021i1p380-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity of notary deed based on incorrect documentation data

Author

Listed:
  • David Hardjo

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Slamet Suhartono

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Endang Prasetyawati

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Otto Yudianto

    (Faculty Of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

Abstract

This type of research is normative legal research. Notary deed made based on incorrect document data, doesn’t cause the deed to be degraded in its validity. This means that the deed is still considered valid. However, the validity depends on the authenticity of the deed in question, namely whether the deed was made in accordance with the law, in this case the 2014 Notary Law carried out in accordance with the correct procedure, and there are no elements of substance defects in its manufacture for other purposes. Contradiction of the validity of the deed which was made based on incorrect document data, of course, is not necessarily justified.

Suggested Citation

  • David Hardjo & Slamet Suhartono & Endang Prasetyawati & Otto Yudianto, 2021. "Validity of notary deed based on incorrect documentation data," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 380-384, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:23:y:2021:i:1:p:380-384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4557/1584
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4557
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    notary; data;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:23:y:2021:i:1:p:380-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.