Author
Listed:
- Jeanne Kawuwung
(Universitas Negeri Manado)
- Jeane Elisabeth Langkai
(Universitas Negeri Manado)
- Itje Pangkey
(Universitas Negeri Manado)
Abstract
The study is intended to analyze the implementation of policies fertilizer subsidy in the Eastern Tombatu subdistrict of Southeast Minahasa, Indonesia. The research uses qualitative research to understand the meaning behind the phenomenon related to implementing the policy procurement and distribution of fertilizer subsidized to farmers in the east Tombatu sub-district, Southeast Minahasa Regency. Data collection techniques, through the methods: a). Observation by making observations about the process of distributing subsidized fertilizers b). Interview with: 1) farmers using subsidized fertilizers, 2) distributor of fertilizer subsidized, 3). department of agriculture, which is in charge of the distribution of fertilizer subsidy. c). Documentation. 1). report the implementation of the policy implemented by the department of agriculture and distributors, 2) documents of fertilizer were distributed, 3) Policy documents. Research shows that the determinants of implementing policies fertilizer subsidy in the southeast Minahasa showed that: a). socialization of policies are outs implemented as of interest policy, b) The length of the bureaucratic structure tends to impact the scarcity of fertilizers when farmers need them. c) The scarcity of fertilizers is that farmers can not obtain subsidized fertilizer because there is no RDK (Definitive Needs Plan Group). In contrast, farmers do not know how to prepare RDK. d). low dispossess implementers to implement policies according to policy objectives. For it is suggested should be: a) do socialization about fertilizer policy subsidized effectively and efficiently to all the groups involved in implementing procedures, b) cut the bureaucratic structure that creates scarcity of fertilizers when farmers need it, c) farmers are taught how to make RDK, d) required a dispossess implementer who earnestly implements policies according to policy objectives, e) provide rewards and sanctions for implementers by their respective primary duties and functions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:184-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tasente Tanase to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.