IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v11y2020i1p46-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflection in Action: Strategies for Teacher Self-evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Ivana Cirkovic-Miladinovic

    (Faculty of Education in Jagodina)

  • Maja Dimitrijevic

    (Faculty of Education in Jagodina, University of Kragujevac, Serbia)

Abstract

Given classroom complexity und uncertainty, teachers face with lots of challenges during their teaching repertoire. They face with specific problems they should respond to and manage so the world of the classroom demands that teachers have practical knowledge that enables them to negotiate the practical problems they face. The fact that reflection in action is a personal, spontaneous, tacit process it means that it limits teachers' opportunity to seek or receive feedback from others or from the reflective episode itself. Moreover, reflections in action focus on events and situations that arise spontaneously und unplanned (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1990). In a real sense, reflection in action is reactive, not proactive. This kind of evaluation has one problematic characteristic: the teacher is both evaluator and evaluatee (Airasian & Gullickson, 1994). Having in mind mentioned challenges for the teacher in the classroom, it would be useful for a teacher to be familiar with some strategies for teacher self-evaluation. The paper presents a study of an online survey to examine teachers': a) self-efficacy to work with multilingual students in the Serbian YLs classroom, b) received training in the area of teaching young learners, c) beliefs about knowledge, skills and resources needed to work with YLs, d) interest in receiving additional training. The research takes into consideration the specific aspects of students' L1, i.e. the Serbian language. Findings suggest that while a majority of the teachers has not received specific training on working with YLs, most of the teachers feel somewhat confident about their ability to work with such student populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivana Cirkovic-Miladinovic & Maja Dimitrijevic, 2020. "Reflection in Action: Strategies for Teacher Self-evaluation," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 11(1), pages 46-58, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:46-58
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/download/1501/573
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/1501
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v11i1.1501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shu Chi Lin, 2020. "An Analysis on Schmidt V.A.'s Discursive Institutionalism and its implications to Taiwan's Teacher Professional Development Policy," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 79-90, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:thr:techub:10011:y:2020:i:1:p:46-58 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Teacher self-evaluation; reflection skills; strategies; assessment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:46-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.