IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v10y2020i1p217-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative View of "A Third Labour Dispute Management System" of China with Ethiopia: Some Cases as Evidence and Recent Labour Issues of both Jurisdictions

Author

Listed:
  • Dessie Tilahun Ayalew

    (LL.B in Law from Jimma University of Ethiopia, LL.M in International Economic Law from the University of South Africa, LL.D candidate in University of International Business and Economics (UIBE) Beijing, China).)

Abstract

The history and political economy transition of China and Ethiopia are quite similar in many aspects. Long history, socialist transition, and legal reform can be mentioned as points of comparison. Among the legal reforms of the two countries, the labor law reform and the determination of working forces (labour forces) was quite critical in both countries that stayed in socialist sentiments though the Chinese model is still "socialism with Chinese characteristics." The opening up and reform of the two countries, the 1978 reform and opening of China and the 1991 market economy declaration of Ethiopia paved the way to shape the labour law legal regime of the two countries. Especially, the labour dispute management system of the two countries shares unique commonalities. The involvement of arbitration in labour dispute system in each jurisdiction has its own unique features. Thus, the paper tried to compare the labour law legal regime, the labour law dispute management system, and the current labour issues of China and Ethiopia. The findings indicate that there are many similarities that the two countries share and can benefit from mutual experience sharing. But, in cases of China, the issues of collective bargaining and labour union-related rights are at their early stage of development. And the treatment of migrant workers and the law, as well as the practice of triangular relationship among the worker, the forwarding unit and receiving unit is very crucial that experience can be taken from it.

Suggested Citation

  • Dessie Tilahun Ayalew, 2020. "A Comparative View of "A Third Labour Dispute Management System" of China with Ethiopia: Some Cases as Evidence and Recent Labour Issues of both Jurisdictions," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 217-246, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:217-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/download/1254/490
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/1254
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labour law reform; Labour dispute management; Labour arbitration; Ethiopia; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:217-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.